public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/2] x86: replace adhoc (partly wrong) ambiguous operand checking for MOVSX/MOVZX
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92fd2cf8-90a0-98f8-9453-c49d911daec6@suse.com> (raw)

1: x86: replace adhoc (partly wrong) ambiguous operand checking for MOVSX/MOVZX
2: x86/AT&T: don't default to byte source for ambiguous for MOVSX/MOVZX

v8 is just to split out the controversial part, in the hope
that at least the main change can go in.

Jan

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14 12:21 Jan Beulich [this message]
2020-02-14 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] x86/AT&T: don't default to byte source for ambiguous " Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 12:28   ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 13:13     ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 13:54     ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 14:16       ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 14:23         ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 14:26           ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 14:32             ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 14:38               ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 15:47                 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 15:52                 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 16:26                   ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 16:36                     ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 16:52                       ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-17 13:44                         ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-17 14:14                           ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-17 15:37                             ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-17 16:56                               ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-17 17:04                                 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-17 17:19                                   ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-18  7:44                                     ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] x86: replace adhoc (partly wrong) ambiguous operand checking " Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 12:31   ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 12:34   ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-14 12:42     ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-14 12:49       ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92fd2cf8-90a0-98f8-9453-c49d911daec6@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).