From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6264 invoked by alias); 16 May 2011 07:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 6255 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2011 07:53:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:53:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56EFCB027F; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBHkCipB--aq; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30ACCB0267; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Release 2.21.1 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <4DD0D695.1090005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 07:53:00 -0000 Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95B530A8-980A-4635-B456-605B587145F0@adacore.com> References: <4DD0D695.1090005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Andreas Krebbel X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 On May 16, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 03/15/2011 09:21 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> now that gcc 4.6 is released, I'd like to know if binutils developers wa= nt a new binutils release. >> Opinions are welcome... >>=20 >> [ I think that not all patches have been back-ported, so do not hesitate= to ping me ] >=20 > Although it isn't a binutils bugfix I need a backport of: >=20 > [PATCH] S/390: Support the .machine pseudo > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00191.html >=20 > in a binutils release asap in order to fix a glibc s390 build issue with = the iconv modules: >=20 > [PATCH] S/390: Use .machine to prevent AS from complaining about z9-109 i= nstructions in > iconv modules > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2011-04/msg00021.html >=20 > Would you accept a backport of this patch in the 2.21 branch? Yes, that's OK.