From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97crFbBHw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3wu42am0e.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
ian@wasabisystems.com (Ian Lance Taylor) wrote on 26.04.04 in <m3wu42am0e.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>:
> Well, the assembler parsing logic is already completely collapsed
> together. It is all done in gas/app.c, using a state machine that
> operates on buffers. (It turns out that there are a number of machine
> dependencies for assembler parsing, but they are still all handled in
> one place.) The output of do_scrub_chars() in gas/app.c is what the
> machine dependent parsers work with.
Has anyone tried including the effects of do_scrub_chars() into that state
machine? It certainly sounds as if that ought to be entirely possible
_and_ fast. Whereas the current two-pass logic sounds rather slow.
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 16:36 Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-17 16:43 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-03-17 16:49 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-18 10:29 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-18 13:15 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-23 23:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 17:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 17:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 18:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 19:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 21:31 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 21:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 23:25 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 23:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-25 0:03 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-25 0:22 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26 0:28 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26 0:58 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26 2:14 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-25 23:35 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 0:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26 2:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 3:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26 14:16 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 14:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-26 14:34 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-04-26 15:29 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 19:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26 19:42 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2004-04-26 19:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 20:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27 1:32 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27 2:02 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-27 2:38 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27 2:35 ` Alan Modra
2004-04-27 3:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27 4:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27 5:19 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27 6:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27 11:43 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-04-27 2:47 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97crFbBHw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).