From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29240 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2010 08:11:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 29231 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2010 08:11:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:11:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E16CB0283; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:11:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xdLlvNR0NsQ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:11:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DC8CB0272; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:11:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Release 2.21 - branch on Friday ? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <4CD2228A.80207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:11:00 -0000 Cc: Binutils Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CC4E1B5-1996-498E-80B7-0DDA3392B81F@adacore.com> References: <48A902C2-D801-401E-8FC1-3E5179D66B70@adacore.com> <8793B508-3103-44AE-8732-C86F11D82FA7@adacore.com> <4CD2228A.80207@gmail.com> To: Dave Korn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Nov 4, 2010, at 4:03 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 03/11/2010 14:12, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> it is high time to start the release as we are far behind the usual >> schedule :-) >>=20 >> I plan to create the branch on Friday 5th (in the morning),=20 >=20 > Which time zone? GMT + 1. >> unless there is a strong reason against it. >=20 > No objection here. I have a couple of fixes that I'll get posted during= the > day/evening (4th, GMT) but there shouldn't be anything seriously tricky a= bout > them. >=20 > cheers, > DaveK >=20