From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-65322-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6416 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2010 08:49:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 6408 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2010 08:49:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:48:59 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82911CB030D; 	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:48:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with ESMTP id h+pGL9TMWOlP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:48:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dhcp-guest-205.act-europe.fr (dhcp-guest-205.act-europe.fr [10.10.127.205]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F074CB0202; 	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:48:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [libbfd] Mach-O format support ?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100414173947.680bc9cc.mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:49:00 -0000
Cc: fleury@labri.fr,  binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9FD2BC70-88A6-49E2-A7CD-9080A95C0D8F@adacore.com>
References: <4BC488C6.8090203@labri.fr> <B4961C12-7468-4CF5-B6F6-E11F22D59F2F@adacore.com> <4BC577D6.6050801@labri.fr> <0708B593-97DB-499D-A89B-ED70E8573F46@adacore.com> <20100414173947.680bc9cc.mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
To: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2


On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:39 AM, mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> How about "nm" for universal binary?

nm on universal binary works too.

> If I execute "nm" of latest binutils (downloaded from CVS)
> and try for universal binary archive (/usr/lib/libwrap.a)
> on Mac OS X, "nm" complains as:
>=20
> $ ./nm-new /usr/lib/libwrap.a=20
> ./nm-new: /usr/lib/libwrap.a:i386: File format not recognized
> ./nm-new: /usr/lib/libwrap.a:powerpc:common: File format not recognized

Yes, nm on universal archive doesn't work, because nm doesn't handle archiv=
es of archives!

Tristan.