From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7003850415 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:57:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3E7003850415 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (tarox.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18955300BF11; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:57:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A12674000DF0; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:57:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9b63da8778cdceea67a286fc1a048b1ed88ce706.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: Readelf: --wide as default if output is redirected From: Mark Wielaard To: Fangrui Song , Katharina Bogad Cc: "binutils@sourceware.org" Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:57:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <0c4f8085-3403-4984-e370-f8624c048438@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-8.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:57:05 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 08:59 -0700, Fangrui Song wrote: > Yeah, I created an alias 're' for 'readelf -W'. Sometimes I need to > provide a command for others and omitting -W has always caused me > trouble. >=20 > To provide a data point, llvm-readelf supports only the wide format > and ignores --wide. It turns out that most projects don't need a > change. Same for eu-readelf: -W, --wide Ignored for compatibility (lines always wide) Cheers, Mark