From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3344 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 22:13:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3335 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2011 22:13:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,FSL_RU_URL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:13:48 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so735349fxm.0 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:13:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.78.135 with SMTP id l7mr6875737fak.116.1297808026259; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:13:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.55.154 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:13:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D5ABFAC.7050804@redhat.com> References: <4D5ABAB2.2000405@redhat.com> <4D5ABFAC.7050804@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciBIbHV6w61u?= Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Testing Call frame information in .debug_frame section To: Richard Henderson Cc: Anitha Boyapati , binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 On 15 February 2011 19:02, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 02/15/2011 09:41 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 02/13/2011 07:10 AM, Petr Hluz=C3=ADn wrote: >>> http://xfree86.cygwin.ru/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00109.html >> >> I'll agree that a better error message would be helpful. > > Committed as follows. > > > r~ > > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* dw2gencfi.c (dot_cfi_dummy): New. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(cfi_pseudo_table) [!TARGET_USE_CFIPOP]: New. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* read.c (pobegin): Unconditionally call cfi_p= op_insert. > Great, thanks. Note: The submitted code code does not print the platform GAS is configured for. If makefile/IDE is accidentally launching wrong build of GAS then user will have hard time figuring this out. If it is not an accident then the extra information is useful for googling since recovery steps may be different. ("CFI on arch FOO? You have to upgrade to version XY" vs "CFI on arch BAR? You have to apply this patch.") -as_bad (_("CFI is not supported for this target")); +as_bad (_("CFI is not supported for target '" TARGET_FORMAT "'")); Also "intelligable" looks like a typo. Perhaps "intelligible"? --=20 Petr Hluzin