On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my build of linux-next (next-20110308, the same with the one from
> yesterday) is broken.
> (I translated the German output.)
>
> [ build.log ]
>  AS      arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.o
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.38-rc7/debian/build/source_i386_none/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S:
> Assembler messages:
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.38-rc7/debian/build/source_i386_none/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S:1421:
> Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a constant
> make[6]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.o] Fehler 1 (Error 1)
> make[5]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Fehler 2 (Error 2)
> make[4]: *** [arch/x86] Fehler 2 (Error 2)
> make[4]: *** Warte auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse... (Waiting for
> unfinished jobs...)
>
> I am not sure if this is a problem of Debian's binutils snapshot from
> binutils-2_21-branch (Debian-version: 2.21.0.20110302-1) from sid/i386
> or this is only a problem for x86, but I just want to let you know.
>
> FYI: The previous binutils (2.21.0.20110216-2) works fine.
>
> I have tried with reverting the last two changes to
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S in linux-next:
>
> "x86: Use {push,pop}_cfi in more places" (see [1])
> "x86, asm: Cleanup unnecssary macros in asm-offsets.c" (see [2])
>
> Reverting both or [1] or [2] breaks with Debians as (2.21.0.20110302-1).
>
> BTW, [3] has a complete GIT history for the above file.
>
> So, I am unsure from where the problem exactly aroses.
> If this a known issue (and a fix around) or rings a bell to you, let
> me and others know.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=60cf637a13932a4750da6746efd0199e8a4c341b
>
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=7bf04be8f48ceeeffa5b5a79734d6d6e0d59e5f8
>
> [3] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=history;f=arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S;h=2878821cb8c1da1d7147b26271114fa9546afe03;hb=HEAD
>

Just FYI (for the "dropped" MLs while finding the "brain bug"):
Finally, with the help of x86 folks and H.J. Lu a fix for the
linux-kernel can now be found in [1].

Commits [2] and [3] from binutils master GIT helped to dig deeper into
the right places.
So I would appreciated both to be backported to binutils-2_21-branch GIT.

@Matthias:
If you like you can use the two backported patches (see file
attachments) for a next binutils upload to Debian/sid.
As usually (and you demanded once from me) I dropped any ChangeLog
entries from the code, but kept the history in the commit-text. Also,
I documented my changes.
So the patches should cleanly apply.

Thanks.

- Sedat -

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/621001/
[2] http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;h=b9521fc0be7945fc842ce1197e241a023378125d
[3] http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;h=cbd141bb69f791de7ea1581abe7afb34f0c61288