From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-70351-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23839 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2011 19:36:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 23699 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2011 19:36:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iw0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:36:10 +0000
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so3340017iwl.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:36:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.213.193 with SMTP id gx1mr3920279icb.77.1298835368232; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:36:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.35.129 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:36:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2mxlh1fg3.fsf@igel.home>
References: <AANLkTim74Yco1_k01rxjAq0wtAQQ564ZYHnTw_=5yTjo@mail.gmail.com>	<m2mxlh1fg3.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTino68nJ0B3CEEpMkHd9vgjw9agN1E4QQQr0+=x7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: m68k fmovem
From: kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2

Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Either it worked in 2.11.2 or the code 'compiled' different and did
not use this instruction.

Any thoughts on whether 2.21 can be built on such an old release of NetBSD?

kevin

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wr=
ote:
> kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> While trying to rebuild gcc 3.4.6 on an old Mac Quadra 700 (68040), I
>> am getting:
>>
>> floatformat.s: Assembler messages:
>> floatformat.s:1047: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
>> %fpcr,%d5' ignored
>> floatformat.s:1163: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
>> %fpcr,%d5' ignored
>>
>> while trying to build floatformat.c from libiberty.
>
> Works fine here with binutils 2.21.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 =A001D3 44D5 214B 8276 4=
ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>