From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16838 invoked by alias); 7 May 2006 01:15:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 16830 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2006 01:15:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from p12018-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (HELO www2.pizzafactory.jp) (222.147.75.18) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 01:15:01 +0000 Received: from [10.100.14.255] (s23.gtokyofl12.vectant.ne.jp [222.228.213.23]) by www2.pizzafactory.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94368099B0; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:14:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <20060506204142.GA29766@nevyn.them.org> References: <9508ACDB-1370-49D4-AC11-100C4EB5D9A8@monami-software.com> <20060506204142.GA29766@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Masaki Muranaka Subject: Re: [patch] Arguments of GTY Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:49:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On 2006/05/07, at 5:41, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It sounds like you are trying to mix and match the include/ headers > from binutils with an older GCC source tree. Is that right? Yes. > Don't do it. GCC has its own copy of these headers and should be > built > using its own copy. Then, why does it still have GTY? -- Masaki Muranaka Monami software