From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127514 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2019 11:52:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127501 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2019 11:52:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=holidays, answers X-HELO: EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com Received: from mail-eopbgr10085.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (40.107.1.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:52:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arm-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cdxBh0U5Fowque0veRHAvwX0sHchzyhy5TBSBVRNvKk=; b=PlnL3Mn18ngIF1CzP52aWsrQX8DjBNxu1nA6QKd3g1nA0bpfMFn3nI4u4xl1xo2OPv4eW8IHyDQ3jw8IcnSoG6hcoLCQBkR3qwLXAeNGIhygqr5g1Ak4BkBhEnir7RTiBXCFzx/Zpf6v6ClZRMGWHUuz3DRZCj0fknflNRb4LjI= Received: from AM6PR08MB3254.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (52.135.164.147) by AM6PR08MB4707.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.255.96.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1792.15; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:52:19 +0000 Received: from AM6PR08MB3254.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b0c0:d31e:fdbb:e1c2]) by AM6PR08MB3254.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b0c0:d31e:fdbb:e1c2%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1813.011; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:52:19 +0000 From: Andre Simoes Dias Vieira To: Alan Modra CC: "nickc@redhat.com" , "binutils@sourceware.org" , nd Subject: RE: [PATCH, binutils, ARM, 0/16] Add support for Armv8.1-M Mainline Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <9d62b2e9-80fb-1b31-2271-79ad052f8a25@arm.com> <5798f7d9-3059-98d7-8d02-9dd39adce0f6@redhat.com> <20190416015753.GQ14424@bubble.grove.modra.org> In-Reply-To: <20190416015753.GQ14424@bubble.grove.modra.org> authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: arm.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 Hi Alan, Thanks for the heads up. I am on holidays so I don't have much time to loo= k at this right now. But after a quick look I think the arm-pe fails are du= e to objdump printing the branch targets in a different format. I'll double= -check later, but it should be a case of accepting both answers. The VxWorks failures seem to be related to the relocations. I did a quick s= earch but couldn't determine whether VxWorks uses Elf binary format. Do you= reckon VxWorks should support this elf relocation? If so I'll need to look= at it a bit further, otherwise I'll skip the relocation tests for VxWorks. Cheers, Andre -----Original Message----- From: Alan Modra =20 Sent: 16 April 2019 02:58 To: Andre Simoes Dias Vieira Cc: nickc@redhat.com; binutils@sourceware.org; nd Subject: Re: [PATCH, binutils, ARM, 0/16] Add support for Armv8.1-M Mainline These failures remain. arm-pe +FAIL: Valid Armv8.1-M Mainline BF instruction arm-pe +FAIL: Valid= Armv8.1-M Mainline BFCSEL instruction arm-pe +FAIL: Valid Armv8.1-M Mainl= ine BFL instruction arm-pe +FAIL: Valid Armv8.1-M Mainline Low Overhead lo= op instructions arm-vxworks +FAIL: Valid Armv8.1-M Mainline BF instruction= with relocation arm-vxworks +FAIL: Valid Armv8.1-M Mainline BFL instructi= on with relocation -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM