From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@googlemail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: binutils prerequisites (recent zlib version - what else?)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=3gkN=Gv1R19tM-ruSgRb-_dsdJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=STTBKete4SUa=5RWad8P4hxfsUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Steffen Dettmer
<steffen.dettmer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> ohh silly me, sorry, I sent my reply to the wrong list :-(
>
> I'm trying again:
>
>>> I noticed that gcc has an option `--with-system-zlib', so in
>>> total I would need --with-system-zlib=no, but if I understand
>>> correctly this is not supported by binutil/bfd.
>>> Did I understand correctly?
>>
>> Unrecognized --with options are ignored.
>
> Yes, I know this from autoconf.
>
>> The difference in the options
>> is because for gcc, zlib is not optional when building libjava. For the
>> binutils zlib is always optional.
>
> so gcc can be built against its own zlib which is included in gcc source
> but binutils cannot?
> I though it could be possible to force to use the own zlib, which seems
> to be impossible.
> anyway, I don't need Java ATM.
>
See:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-10/msg00539.html
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 12:44 Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-26 14:52 ` Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-26 16:27 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-04-26 16:34 ` Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-26 17:04 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2011-04-26 18:34 ` Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-26 18:05 ` kevin diggs
2011-04-26 18:11 ` kevin diggs
2011-04-26 18:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-04-26 18:19 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-04-26 18:39 ` Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-26 18:44 ` Steffen Dettmer
2011-04-27 6:08 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2011-08-04 22:08 ` [PATCH] Correct zlib checks [Was: binutils prerequisites (recent zlib version - what else?)] Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-08-05 7:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=3gkN=Gv1R19tM-ruSgRb-_dsdJA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=steffen.dettmer@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).