From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-71567-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25468 invoked by alias); 9 May 2011 14:09:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 25460 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2011 14:09:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:08:55 +0000
Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1131024qyk.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Mon, 09 May 2011 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.46.74 with SMTP id i10mr5140826qcf.64.1304950131931; Mon, 09 May 2011 07:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.182.7 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110509135326.GU7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>
References: <20110505051832.GA28229@intel.com>	<20110505082721.GG7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<BANLkTikJOrFiAEAh1uHgHft-29JtgKx_5g@mail.gmail.com>	<20110505141230.GJ7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<BANLkTi=nhJSWTC2z+gxxOTBDODm_wM78gQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinaLJRc1Q5O=EnGH0eqRWMYBB5x6g@mail.gmail.com>	<20110507081035.GR7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<BANLkTimWntPAuVK8zNzK0kek0nFcfUJW+A@mail.gmail.com>	<20110507140441.GS7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<20110509135326.GU7018@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=RFvQbFJNNSjx9Jm=U+6Jqm+9V+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR ld/12730: regression] crash when allocating in a static constructor
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to wonder whether ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr12730.cc is
> valid. =A0Does gcc actually make any guarantee about order of static
> constructors and __attribute ((constructor)) functions?

I have similar doubt.

> Compiled with gcc-4.3 branch g++, the testcase segfaults at all
> optimization levels. =A0Compiled with gcc-4.4 branch g++, the testcase
> runs at -O0 but segfaults at -O1 and above. =A0It happens to run OK with
> gcc mainline and 4.6. =A0Given that behaviour, and the fact that some
> popular distros ship gcc-4.4 based compilers, I'm thinking that the
> testcase should be removed.
>

I will do that.

--=20
H.J.