From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2131 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2011 18:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 2110 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2011 18:34:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f41.google.com) (209.85.210.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:34:18 +0000 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so685021pzk.0 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.24.40 with SMTP id r8mr1270215pbf.161.1303842857384; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.40.99 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: binutils prerequisites (recent zlib version - what else?) From: Steffen Dettmer To: binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:04 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> so gcc can be built against its own zlib which is included in gcc source >> but binutils cannot? >> I though it could be possible to force to use the own zlib, which seems >> to be impossible. >> anyway, I don't need Java ATM. > > See: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-10/msg00539.html If I understand correctly, this describes the solution for exactly my confusion, right? So the issue is that this change is not included in the version I'm using (binutils-2.21), right? Regards, Steffen