From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-71626-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32134 invoked by alias); 12 May 2011 02:34:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 32066 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2011 02:34:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_BD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:33:55 +0000
Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so782508qwa.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.27.65 with SMTP id h1mr7630972qcc.216.1305167634438; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.182.7 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimpu2+Y5bojA1RJydfgtuZcMPvFaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinEW3TWYHy04EGP-Cto-mOFErpWrg@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimdze1=oXv6ZYhfJBF9oxz6rs7LCQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinukDoLD-yJ6SyfDbAjLO=NvHiN2w@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinNnuhwjwp_0+FubD4=wzSixt6XvA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTin=2GZV86x7xSKQGFyQyryD2ED=tw@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimwWnxZu+NCoGaUL2Z53ptEsK-S2g@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinkb8=QQ2mApx9CweRw5eaGNY28kw@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinVmyo9kE6780FEz_2Fog2=RmR+yw@mail.gmail.com>	<4DCA4B670200007800040E8A@vpn.id2.novell.com>	<BANLkTimKsyN1vUcTvcBMF0xfPc6eZgOwxA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimpu2+Y5bojA1RJydfgtuZcMPvFaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 02:34:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTik3NXE+3po-qh7gVWYLKTQVmZFxZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add bdver2 processor.
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Quentin Neill <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Quentin Neill
> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 10.05.11 at 21:10, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Quentin Neill
>>>>> Should I rename the PROCESSOR_BDVER1 variable to perhaps PROCESSOR_BDVER?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> And in a couple of years from now nobody will be able to tell what the
>>> "VER" in the name stands for ...
>>>
>>> Jan
>>
>> I thought of that last night when I got home.
>>
>> I'll change it to PROCESSOR_BD with another patch.
>> --
>> Quentin
>
> So attached is the tested PROCESSOR_BD variable rename patch, which
> passes "make check" in x86_64.
>
> Okay to commit?

OK.


-- 
H.J.