On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10.05.11 at 21:10, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Quentin Neill
>>>> Should I rename the PROCESSOR_BDVER1 variable to perhaps PROCESSOR_BDVER?
>>>
>>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> And in a couple of years from now nobody will be able to tell what the
>> "VER" in the name stands for ...
>>
>> Jan
>
> I thought of that last night when I got home.
>
> I'll change it to PROCESSOR_BD with another patch.
> --
> Quentin

So attached is the tested PROCESSOR_BD variable rename patch, which
passes "make check" in x86_64.

Okay to commit?
-- 
Quentin

P.S. I noticed that on yesterday's cvs commit I neglected commit the
opcodes/ directory; ARG!   I went ahead and did that before this
patch.