From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-71582-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4650 invoked by alias); 10 May 2011 17:56:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 4640 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2011 17:56:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_BD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:55:50 +0000
Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2224034qyk.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.66.132 with SMTP id n4mr6469379qci.292.1305050149504; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.182.7 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin=2GZV86x7xSKQGFyQyryD2ED=tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinEW3TWYHy04EGP-Cto-mOFErpWrg@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimdze1=oXv6ZYhfJBF9oxz6rs7LCQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinukDoLD-yJ6SyfDbAjLO=NvHiN2w@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinNnuhwjwp_0+FubD4=wzSixt6XvA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTin=2GZV86x7xSKQGFyQyryD2ED=tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimwWnxZu+NCoGaUL2Z53ptEsK-S2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add bdver2 processor.
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Quentin Neill <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Quentin Neill
>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:45 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Quentin Neill
>>>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds the bdver2 processor flag. =A0It passes make check on=
 x86-64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay to commit?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gas/
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* config/tc-i386.c (cpu_arch): Add bdver2.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(i386_align_code): Add PROCESSOR_BDVER2 cases.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* config/tc-i386.h (processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_BDV=
ER2.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* doc/c-i386.texi: Add bdver2.
>>>>>
>>>>> opcodes/
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* i386-gen.c (cpu_flag_init): Add new CPU_BDVER2_FLAGS.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* i386-init.h: Regenerated.
>>>>>
>>>>> gas/testsuite/
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gas/i386/i386.exp: Add new bdver2 test cases.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gas/i386/nops-1-bdver2.d: New.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gas/i386/x86-64-nops-1-bdver2.d: New.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you nreally nned PROCESSOR_BDVER2? Can you use PROCESSOR_BDVER1? in=
stead?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> H.J.
>>>>
>>>
>>> BDVER2 adds BMI and TBM.
>>
>> That is controlled by CPU_BDVER2_FLAGS.
>>
>
> [ Sorry for the delay, =A0I was out for a couple of days. =A0Re-adding
> binutils@sourceware.org (I meant to copy on my 2nd reply). ]
>
> So without PROCESSOR_BDVER2, that means no -march=3Dbdver2 flag support,
> but what else?
>

Can you replace PROCESSOR_BDVER2 with  PROCESSOR_BDVER1
to see if it makes a difference?

--=20
H.J.