From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-83596-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11475 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2014 14:42:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 11465 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2014 14:42:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:42:52 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53345272C32D;	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:42:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id JoFtec7XMKNV; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:42:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67])	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28195272C286;	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:42:49 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: bfd target vector rationalisation
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140430143503.GE16139@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:42:00 -0000
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <BDF250AD-2E76-42C3-9A65-72D5DF8B3C0E@adacore.com>
References: <20140430143503.GE16139@bubble.grove.modra.org>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2


On 30 Apr 2014, at 16:35, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:

> This renames the bfd targets to <cpu>_<format>_<other>_<endian>_vec.
> So for example, bfd_elf32_ntradlittlemips_vec becomes
> mips_elf32_ntrad_le_vec and hp300bsd_vec becomes m68k_aout_hp300bsd_vec.

Shouldn't this convention be documented (for example in targets.c) ? (I
may have missed that in the long patch).

Tristan.