From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1500 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2014 14:07:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1490 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2014 14:07:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vc0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:07:01 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id lf12so4031372vcb.15 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3W+aHvPwSMg77y4DWUr1bRbRJGnZwIAij80mur9YGxA=; b=frpJbCTErOFB/MQzW1HM5lIJ+F/Xdxrz+eHH1C/tfskIQz+zfaVlF7SO7tLGWPDh6A YgcoPvAfSjthK6SUv8+RJVamY4a3AumKxUSJFg0nZZ5e61Xjh87V3KNMi8+o6J2qxEHU MtEzT7lpLmSi8yAfz9CRT0j49HYiG3i+R3e/bSivhoLFzuRdvRixH0cHCygFEF9zAbyL FlpoJBplRq6Bf+0gmingK2zeXkGfS+qAd9VWzuLzedruJFySXc3QWBtN/UzyF0dtkfGI UxAzvBNcWjn9Euqqh2SwZ64+kHnx4BxxOEYIbk1wJ1aBcZxqY9Mtfm5flXxI5qtlV0Am R7RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVwBr6a65Yq5KB7kbIjyeuG0yRJuMJ6dLilkjZm5xv7vZgdRShjMLiZjWDMysQrDY8Ll1i MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.92.5 with SMTP id p5mr10683443vcm.7.1407334019180; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.151.11 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: [AArch64/gas] v[0-31] registers not allowed in cfi_offset? From: Steven Vormwald To: binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 Are the v[0-31] registers intentionally not supported in cfi_offset? I'm trying to figure out whether this is an oversight in gas due to aarch64 support being relatively new (seems likely given bug 16694) or if they are intentionally not supported and I need to stop emitting cfi_offset with them. Thanks, Steven Vormwald