From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1F63858D28 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:33:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7C1F63858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vrull.eu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vrull.eu Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f9b4a71623so44731825e9.1 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 07:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vrull.eu; s=google; t=1687876388; x=1690468388; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u+hWiSDcaASGa0qQYKs1bcI7VNy0BAblYp5yrw0tvA8=; b=Q6Qcd7rHKAgrwGNt5blP+N5v1WC8A+DG/nH3uzfjglDE0oPI+JE1x2Q7fFmX2gPGAz 1f0/JFMKArozIwxQr42nI1Oda991Bao0j3W/JA0wQ5c85zEIrRLqab1NCjkQMk0bVBA3 CWGZ3Hgx0UezGKbUJc/WnfQyXQEifr3gWUlUkcZqNv7ouprviZI1NDooPqazb/a47gpj 3/vSPbl39/TOSSWSKHV1oyVRqn8VIwC610zn+iDSGlxX+S49fBW/eD2GEuCPNriqS0hd GQBHNsb6Of1I5SWMENcEefPvfBqcA4RX/ShXiUxK/JrxORiGfkkYM0BGkChD7yKJCuOJ tVsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687876388; x=1690468388; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=u+hWiSDcaASGa0qQYKs1bcI7VNy0BAblYp5yrw0tvA8=; b=eeSz/PDfS8Iypbg8c5q7RgrblMcwbvRb6tKNlhyqwoYywFqSa+aoR3uo7yvMBi7S6S WwMcGPcIzQKkKcCdK0TvMiIAyEWpuvBrCSXfbXF99Ld6NxmQ25gTU99K7svRcp3iQ/rV GR/Tm/S35pRIYnAgb+nXgxsaBIbKJTx2c/z2X6lhuKjFZGoIwBQw4VPfgC9siLZLtyOc TBl/eXejHlF5vG1/WDKWwxTh+BnbRyYf1l1/Ak3PFIDwUDhCDlyd4qNgVWAsJ3tRvmi7 Fxj9iigV3X1O2OUJWfLN4UkIu43E76ijnMtCdwbAyuyWa150w5Yhoc3ArpyYimigtFFE RFSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwDygVst7bIfEuWJz3JVKJqBSUxEo92Q4sqMMoQVLiYEEJq6z/T ajBvfHWABoaJaYXsMJcq2nSnD725muL6Gw6jEO4rOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5mdkeNLA5HTuGxCHpobtEcmg321MwQBcrfl5UQqIlZ/VExuU1tLcCJCMLHmee2ja5s+/UcgyrH88AHnat5898= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:b44:b0:3fa:82ae:3577 with SMTP id k4-20020a05600c0b4400b003fa82ae3577mr6954520wmr.9.1687876388050; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 07:33:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Philipp Tomsich Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 07:32:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support Zicond extension To: Jeff Law Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , binutils@sourceware.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu, kito.cheng@sifive.com, nelson@rivosinc.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088ed5005ff1d5816" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --00000000000088ed5005ff1d5816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for taking care of this. I had v2 in the queue for this week=E2=80=94even better if it took care of = itself. The updated GCC patches should go out right after the final (incorporating comments from the public review) specification goes out. Philipp. On Tue 27. Jun 2023 at 06:27, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 6/20/23 22:38, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:25:12 PDT (-0700), binutils@sourceware.org wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 6/19/23 08:21, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > >>> Given that the 2.41 milestone is approaching and Zicond has passed the > >>> FREEZE milestone (and is even out of public review already), I would > >>> like to move this forward. > >>> Is this OK for trunk? Should I resubmit with an updated commit > message? > >> Given they were acked with "this is fine to go forward with the spec > >> freezes", I think they can go forward now. I think you just need to > >> fixup the ChangeLog a bit since it references > >> INSN_CLASS_XVENTANACONDOPS ;-) > > > > Can whomever (IIRC Philipp?) sent the first version just send a v2 with > > the various bits fixed up (ie, no RFC, no "don't merge this" header, and > > the review comments addressed)? That way there's a chance folks will > > actually look at it. > Seems a bit silly to keep deferring this. I went ahead and fixed up the > ChangeLog entry to reference INSN_CLASS_ZICOND rather than > INSN_CLASS_XVENTANACONDOPS as well as the spec URL and version number > and pushed the result. > > Jeff > --00000000000088ed5005ff1d5816--