From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19569 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2012 21:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19551 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2012 21:08:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:08:01 +0000 Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so14417wey.0 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.204 with SMTP id m54mr10678607wei.93.1343164079668; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.32.35 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1343163796.27950.119.camel@jsm2> References: <500EBB83.5040009@ipdatasys.com> <1343157254.27950.108.camel@jsm2> <500F0A49.4070600@ipdatasys.com> <1343163796.27950.119.camel@jsm2> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maintainers file patch for M68HC1x port. From: Fred Cooke To: James Murray Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, Sean Keys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 James, > > The bulk of your patch was for XGATE support within the HC1x tools, not > > fixes or additions to the port itself. > > Erm? What about the addition of the S12X instruction support, objdump > output enhancements and HC11, HC12 testcase fixes ? Those all sound very > much like fixes and additions to the port itself. Yes, they certainly are, however they're overshadowed by the size of your XGATE-in-other-assembler hacks. Regards, Fred.