FW: Release 2.23: Ping #2

FW: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Eggone, NagaJyothi]

Hi Tristan,

You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html

Thanks,
NagaJyothi
Saravanan


-----Original Message-----
From: Eggone, NagaJyothi 
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:32 PM
To: binutils@sourceware.org
Cc: Ekanathan, Saravanan; Eggone, NagaJyothi
Subject: RE: Release 2.23: Ping #2


Hi Tristan,
  Please backport following patches to 2.23 branch:
1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html

Regards,
Saravanan
Nagajyothi


-----Original Message-----
From: binutils-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:binutils-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tristan Gingold
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 2:32 PM
To: binutils Development
Subject: Release 2.23: Ping #2

I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch.  If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.

Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.

Thanks,
Tristan.

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Tristan Gingold]

On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:

> Hi Tristan,
> 
> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
> 1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html

Yes, this patch is still on my list.  Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.

Tristan.

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Doug Kwan (關振德)]

Hi Tristan,

    Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html

-Doug

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>
>> Hi Tristan,
>>
>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>> 1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>
> Yes, this patch is still on my list.  Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>
> Tristan.
>

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Tristan Gingold]

On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:

> Hi Tristan,
> 
>    Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html

Yes.  Would you do it ?

Tristan.

> 
> -Doug
> 
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Tristan,
>>> 
>>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>>> 1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>> 
>> Yes, this patch is still on my list.  Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>> 
>> Tristan.
>> 

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Doug Kwan (關振德)]

I just checked in the patch.

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00081.html

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
>
>> Hi Tristan,
>>
>>    Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html
>
> Yes.  Would you do it ?
>
> Tristan.
>
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tristan,
>>>>
>>>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>>>> 1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>>>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>>>
>>> Yes, this patch is still on my list.  Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>>>
>>> Tristan.
>>>
>

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Tristan Gingold]

On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:

> Hi Tristan,
> 
> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
> 1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html

Now committed on the branch.

Tristan.

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Tristan Gingold]

On Sep 17, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Walter Lee wrote:

> On 9/17/2012 7:05 AM, Walter Lee wrote:
>> 
>> Is it possible to backport the following:
>> 
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00100.html
>> 
>> This fixes a bug when linking with -relro -now, which is needed to
>> support glibc.
> 
> Also the followup fix to suppress a gcc 4.7 compiler warning:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00103.html

Now committed.

Tristan.

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Walter Lee]

On 9/17/2012 7:05 AM, Walter Lee wrote:
> 
> Is it possible to backport the following:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00100.html
> 
> This fixes a bug when linking with -relro -now, which is needed to
> support glibc.

Also the followup fix to suppress a gcc 4.7 compiler warning:

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00103.html

Thanks,

Walter

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Walter Lee]

Is it possible to backport the following:

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00100.html

This fixes a bug when linking with -relro -now, which is needed to
support glibc.

Thanks,

Walter

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.

In <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00101.html> I
mentioned
<http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00008.html> but
got the description wrong; that was for a SEGV on a .section
directive.  The "FAIL: gas/mmix/fb-2" patch is in
<http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00243.html>.

Ok for 2.23?

> Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release
> at anytime before Friday.

Oops.  But it hasn't happened yet AFAICT, so here we go.

brgds, H-P

Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:01:49AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch.  If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
> If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.

I decided to put my pr14464 fix for ppc64 onto the branch.  It's one
of those bugs that probably doesn't affect too many people so I hadn't
bothered to commit the fix there.  OTOH, the fix ought to be quite
safe.  If you have already begun the release process, I'm not fussed
if this fix didn't make it into the release.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

RE: Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Eggone, NagaJyothi]

Hi Tristan,
  Please backport following patches to 2.23 branch:
1)PR14423 fix -  http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html


Regards,
Saravanan
Nagajyothi


-----Original Message-----
From: binutils-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:binutils-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tristan Gingold
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 2:32 PM
To: binutils Development
Subject: Release 2.23: Ping #2

I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch.  If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.

Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.

Thanks,
Tristan.

Release 2.23: Ping #2

[Tristan Gingold]

I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch.  If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.

Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.

Thanks,
Tristan.