From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11525 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2016 15:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11420 invoked by uid 89); 19 Apr 2016 15:54:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-qg0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f51.google.com) (209.85.192.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:54:44 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f52so11368558qga.3 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=hhErJQ8aDfjr+b0EqQS/TCGeA+bzqNB6P6kbW+1Skrg=; b=Xv5uKhFknDSHVncQso42G5/jlZZn0s4LTDOqEmIpvN4k7CuVvNL7CxQVevrwsTUWbi jAVoYPf3GWbnjs5FtBSw3bNi8qA0VWwavEQq/zTH7Gpksilc7VyttJfiDBqvgpHvQfTR fO8+UN6Tckf/X2/cqShe0xBGhbLwhiwNql5nnV+hOb3ZhkOEEWZ5Ci2aSa4dpb6mmcsp H34MjexuuaYFExLbDC9nyAoGWH6mLlQdD/oq2hN4xGe6VBRvVs3qrOW94q9HFDrT7bdr Sn7m+8fzAJJlENYcTqupWkAhYFds0UO5I6MPOlm+sIitlLIMvIpU8CJqmHtsMfAEnD7I uVew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUw0jI7ELq6CsRCQ7+uVfw09FLT2O+oQJNjbjkhihVo5kj2NGdRin0PBdkzJgZC8qA27F/QBEcOWw6uZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.88.111 with SMTP id s102mr4416527qgd.63.1461081282446; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.60.3 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:54:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6AAD87D2-90F9-4AD7-A195-AC91B76EA6AE@apple.com> <56FB5061.9010303@redhat.com> <20160330143421.GM15812@bubble.grove.modra.org> <571161D0.10601@redhat.com> <20160418144911.GG15088@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20160419050805.GI15088@bubble.grove.modra.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] From: Cary Coutant To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Michael Matz , Richard Biener , Alan Modra , Jeff Law , Joe Groff , Binutils , GCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 > Cary, please stop spreading the incorrect information. There is > at lease one GCC bug against protected symbol: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012 > > which was reported by other people. OK, so it got reported once by someone else. But that bug was based on an incorrect understanding of protected visibility; the real problem there was the lack of diagnostic from the linker. -cary