From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18363 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 20:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 18355 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2012 20:56:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:56:11 +0000 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so4251106vcb.0 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.111 with SMTP id c15mr5390562vdf.2.1346446570697; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.162.198 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release 2.23: Ping From: Jeff Sheldon To: binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: > as far as I understand, aarch64 was committed in the 2.23 branch. I'd like to thanks for doing this timely. > > Is there any patch that need to be in the 2.23 release ? Please, reply quickly as I'd like to do the release soon. If commits are made to master after 2.3 is released, will they be allowed to go into 2.3.1 or is that reserved strictly for fixes (while new commits work towards 2.4)? -Jeff