From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29484 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2013 14:20:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 29474 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2013 14:19:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:19:54 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so178442obb.25 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:19:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=h/dEE+LPayWme4pMGUivddE8+tIcL+bNURh3uzhWhmI=; b=Q+Bq9Ux5fuPE8wlpELzdSnf7tki7IrSP2R5Lj2i9hVKMvKs3+msT0PpGjOPPhwzuQL dQ8ZpOXwiU+Zw3XYcpD5gxnKOVMmW6nqbIsMmHwD49BEDfkr3F+x0ObpukCH/XXO+Tyf 3zzEaNe9O10AJXw6bMeJ6LN9kvCCrJ5B997vdPgu4kAKtMjIN81XQ0DlgzTfiuTKa5Zk N4gSx+ybWoA4QSEW4CkXm69n3jDdgJZ9e4gdqh0xCCoVw1BWI+Us0Sz0/0Ai+SFJeMzg LDXkN496j0vrZfvktTZrc7TbI7sJWU3bhQnClDlvnzipmRaxfgSgEtCR5Hbh83/GotMg bm9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.7.199 with SMTP id l7mr18996795oea.136.1360073994233; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:19:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.23.39 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:19:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130205093846.GH5023@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <1356420600-11507-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1358483201-12733-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1358483201-12733-2-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20130205093846.GH5023@bubble.grove.modra.org> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] gold: enable new dtags by default From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Ian Lance Taylor , "H.J. Lu" , Mike Frysinger , binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWv0B0CnEovykx0YDQLEfRkf7xVI1oT1jGrEL1GBs0zO19pxSijgP12kdpx27Hk66pfGI47Ck4A6Q5QDOQ8Dav0bom8ihsaW4fMGo2JD4MXc92rteGfomWCh10iEteUf4czzj5IbgRKfDdg3NtDyuy6YrmG7gLeWG2h4LPjatO0UnbTh0HYwDK6vGif58G6hqAf+bG X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:43:04PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> It seems that we have made sensible-seeming decisions to wind up in an >> absurd place. > > Right, so where did we go wrong? I think it was in assuming that we > could default to --enable-new-dtags. Users were affected. (I'm > assuming HJ's PR ld/15096 came from a real world problem.) > > I propose reverting HJ's patch, and Mike's and Roland's 2013-02-21 > patches. That will leave us with just Mike's 2013-01-18 change to > disable old dtags when new dtags are selected. If people want new > dtags by default, do so via the gcc driver. I wonder if it would make sense to add a -runpath option to set DT_RUNPATH. Ian