From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Y7oE=DL=gmail.com=wzssyqa@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D9A3858D3C
	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A8D9A3858D3C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bb893e6365so16127385ad.2
        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690293662; x=1690898462;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
         :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=kc1F6McsEwMETtJWg+AJWGPM26RLRg7/dLff/Kqmcqc=;
        b=khDI44rczeYAPSoHFykA33Ldz6LSZMBokYYl5a5H7XhsAQCp8Cn/jAJ0ZE7Hsg6PyQ
         QGs42IkMRDTn0tmC/DCNVtIRf8cLST9UQUZxeAIWcgvg0dxxVqA2cIDlKfGsM8LmWvsG
         ycBdxU1P5MlPsgV8wPtHV2XjAXEJBAcXlh3Yxhq9skNys4T9hW1KqPWrPLUgeQ5Ff+gj
         84rsS+R4wIhA4wiR0Fuqp9hbWJguS6bLitYmrr80TzWVIChtNewZWch2ePRE7Hznbmoz
         quZmZ9ebAjLMQfmCpX1Srm2EGuSQewCAfyGuVi2MtvtZXeqhNnbjfJFLIF5WwGIYQWwd
         sHIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLY6MwBD+Gp/xTU1rxWAHT0czZopoJPseqDXG4zkmMeDN3GOQ2FA
	IbaDQT0HScBO2Hw3x83D2S2rdsM1kGsqg1MXM10=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEMTnEnjie3EodxlIdE9grq6wN+rjqrBqEFXdpwDc/PeikzBIJTQKWdEaMVb13x7i0oxGLozrYwQZpuRtJ4Q3w=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e995:b0:1b8:a328:c1e6 with SMTP id
 f21-20020a170902e99500b001b8a328c1e6mr11778902plb.63.1690293662016; Tue, 25
 Jul 2023 07:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230414072046.1639896-1-yunqiang.su@cipunited.com>
 <20230418140019.2195551-1-yunqiang.su@cipunited.com> <mptmt33elyr.fsf@arm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2307210244080.17594@angie.orcam.me.uk> <CAKcpw6V54hZ4hVXR=DJRmGoVQxjarOqsDOPNOuQOstnTbTDfPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2307211237530.17594@angie.orcam.me.uk> <CAKcpw6Vg129nW50h5KSKEfjb2otW8JrtDOM9nByEFJijMK0FCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2307211439440.17594@angie.orcam.me.uk> <CAKcpw6X1K6F4RSTdY0mcU5imQMTOSQ_eAeMW8g9StTpFdj-0Yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <f56eced472ee05fed42d534086d1284a86c331a7.camel@xry111.site> <708df697-9dd9-3c75-9e6b-a45795771d78@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <708df697-9dd9-3c75-9e6b-a45795771d78@redhat.com>
From: YunQiang Su <syq@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:00:51 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKcpw6U3L_=0niZrVW-3cCj6iV8RLCgByCh_vwq3WaQFZXV7wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] MIPS: support mips*64 as CPU and gnuabi64 as ABI
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>, 
	"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>, 
	YunQiang Su <yunqiang.su@cipunited.com>, binutils@sourceware.org, 
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8825=E6=97=A5=
=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C 21:30=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>    Do we have a conclusion on this issue ?
>

I have no idea about Maciej.

>    If time is still needed for debate then can we at least make sure that=
 the 2.41
>    branch does not have any regressions when compared to the 2.40 branch =
?
>

For me, I don't think that it is a regression, instead it is a bugfix.

>    I would really like to create the 2.41 release at some point in the ne=
xt few
>    days, so fixing/isolating this problem is a priority.
>
> Cheers
>    Nick
>
>