From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (mail-pg1-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911BC3858D20 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:42:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 911BC3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gcc.gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 911BC3858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.215.180 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705070526; cv=none; b=cruhgeL9MSI8fwMZQRj9rDXCo0SPRIUeYLEJaGuhevZ+dqBohytUno5xBdnEXWG8agqkHiej9OQQkavLyCDQ2jtKgMCiSG++qycqW/ZfT73M+0pSCAeb951qRpXxYUSlIuyQ3PYKDps+/DkgTLBcMC5s5RakAHHeOiYOk1/vZDU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705070526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rq8T4ex5lh8KdRMBoJO7wbBWMNsEO3GOQcnJyCNk704=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=Ehtq1ajJKF6cAJJICObibBfOwhGsMHYfETadver0Y0Kkm01HGqKanpgnCK3+5lm02/d5yTeJZC65HKzBvEtli84ZCrFu+p9hvcmNWGzComp3kgzHOVwJD+3UHBzWVDR0iz4kFFozf4kC4w08J4QUl9V6TLZwSAmOi3bGRsFHgJk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5c65ca2e1eeso3266581a12.2 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:42:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705070524; x=1705675324; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dKsoysUcDS6k/1It2sPOvro6r1s696NnfP/kapF8ctc=; b=LQc8xCXefJSM3RkqriyJbtVe8Vb+PaOMSEunCEoQarwfWl0MHCbSLH7zzo8bLVPcko puvALVij4WTNNxSljKTWYuOjXXo+AarMPUeyBTw1y87ZF5dilT+KhuN2PAibAPF3Lz0O uUzfUWdgeuC0usYtgLvaM7cgFO3bt46DdopQY/u9soluSZhGpfkAzmFp5nMjuFfSzQBC YPO0tgm56F2Lw7sKD9Q0e2UkySQcp4wkRASQbqv1hE0v5rrzQnyXCUjsvZK4YIMHEHvR +AcabKMrp2A/83ELSBcIufMhCyUI9eNsMjJnEOYLTot+1vNtW5LfzsMFAf3fTgRsGsjb MPIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy2qlZTpiNVgHxFgHxIdv/HkNmo0ZIUoGhWxP8MEPliG4pSwv8m fp6w0BL4uLFwKWKoazc9SHVjzLeW52YRv+yh X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEi8WkNhw3TGQkP9s9oEC1bKpARBiVvlgeD5uKzzGHKshM6vbUwcNGSJHdRY+zMy4fldo+V9w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ed8b:b0:1d5:7316:c893 with SMTP id e11-20020a170902ed8b00b001d57316c893mr914337plj.24.1705070524469; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pg1-f178.google.com (mail-pg1-f178.google.com. [209.85.215.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kj11-20020a17090306cb00b001d34796c1e9sm3211952plb.119.2024.01.12.06.42.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5cf495b46caso234716a12.1 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:238e:b0:1d5:36b3:bd82 with SMTP id v14-20020a170903238e00b001d536b3bd82mr1161521plh.16.1705070524152; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <92969380-bc94-4f42-ad8c-4a555ef9470f@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <92969380-bc94-4f42-ad8c-4a555ef9470f@suse.com> From: YunQiang Su Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 22:41:52 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Gas: Any pseudo instruction to disable a single RELOC? To: Jan Beulich Cc: binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > I don't think there is, and I don't think there should be. People using > .reloc absolutely need to know what they are doing. > Thank you, I find a solution. BAL . + 4 won't emit any relocs. Background: MIPS pre-R6 has no instructions that can read PC directly, thus we have to use an branch and link instruction to do so. I am working on GCC to support it. I don' want to emit an label for this simple branch.