From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE6C3857342 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 03:00:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3BE6C3857342 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-666b2f860ceso284904b3a.1 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686884454; x=1689476454; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vDB42JywB1NTSG0XisUAje9a8q24ReJ3tI1tau71ySw=; b=DDdLfT2m9TcpMGVW7Gh9jgat3xLpl0omYy4c3eizrAOTmUUZIGsYVn7P/i8yBwHQJD 1D8xV2PUrZQAxwGGhrpvnD2y3ygYfFZpNBzV5QEXJU3F3vTz0gROnbUAM0Q1wT4qfPs4 hiSYT7Da9Iz6IIwx5GqfxhOrRvyf18q8rYF2m6h8B/TbKeagy7xHCX+Y7iEQjNSW6a6R k2MKaZHZw61NskW1ud0GOpYUCQFjXQeWiypgknpSVn0HApHQRPQEDDAyBMSHMx+jR0RL +tyAjlVYvZq50UrkM1aPwUKVN8Kpw+Wzz6vaKzLnE9M3mol052aUTamE+ht0iHlKZaR+ 4TTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686884454; x=1689476454; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vDB42JywB1NTSG0XisUAje9a8q24ReJ3tI1tau71ySw=; b=QLbGY+IZd/Td+OuNaEfX8bq+Synb9likVpLNI/VNU9yOWcQgK9cANGJPIzGjrpYowD 9p04s39AE6Q/bxRwttxkzaETFqzauFlvpoho4xm/pD1+N+cm2l6QoMNjrouJxqkradsG XNuACX9NgbLXjgOydxyOrNMGBXNKpQHjLAQxYuVxcYIrT4gyihZQNLIc3nqWMP+gpgzZ +DSiOtun37Lw3quUMbKLlCaHdMg565d6tRbH+p0Uqqoo4bGJjH3CGzLnEtu7QMoljQ3x XHMzAg9fZBfUVrrdgwXNcnNlT39RGQnkc6LJEH4ffM+xr7pyuxzQEMvQFH/voMMAMFNa f2GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzfHJSu/Qb3JITVBuKHuF5+yJD4vvQwGOecehOIFHvCu6vWK5qn s6yd1/xs5pkZy+7JOHQE7Owk298/ovKBsxwMDco= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5ZZeAQRzYmzvjawVndkIc4vq9RouifftJLR26zmj4vpFb/aRrFRlgcnT36oWugSdNqD5wwPPyHnHXcgQJ80E0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:2594:b0:11d:1d3d:143c with SMTP id k20-20020a056a20259400b0011d1d3d143cmr1101435pzd.56.1686884454070; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:00:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87zg51m295.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: YunQiang Su Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:00:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New failures for the mips64el-openbsd target To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Nick Clifton , binutils@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Maciej W. Rozycki =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8815=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B 22:43=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > Hi Nick, > > > I do not know if these are related to your recent gas testuite fix > > (2b462da34de977f953a778afa0cb55e3286ece3d), but would you mind > > checking please ? If you cannot reproduce the problems, then it is > > probably an issue at my end - maybe I need to rerun the configure > > script or something like that - and I will investigate some more. > > It may well be that one of the YunQiang Su's patches I have reverted > brough these back; a regression from his earlier commit(s) anyway. > I run a test with the below commit, because the next commit of it is my first commit to binutils. commit 2e6be59c8de57c32260771ac5307968d18793a0a (HEAD -> xxxxx) Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jul 25 13:05:27 2019 +0100 Stop an illegal memory access by readelf when parsing a corrupt MIPS binary file. PR 24837 * readelf.c (process_mips_specific): Check for buffer overflow before reading reginfo information. The test fails do exist with this commit. So I think that it is a long time problem, and in fact my recent commits resolve them. > I haven't run any verification on the reverts as I don't think there is > any excuse for violating our policies and committing patches with no prio= r > approval and/or with objections raised. I think let's wait and see how > YunQiang handles it, and if it turns out to be a failure, then I'll handl= e > it one way or another (maybe his earlier commits need to be reverted too)= . > I will resend my patchset, of course with more code style checks. > NB YunQiang has been around long enough to know what our policies are an= d > what the requirements are for good patch submissions. Conversely the Son= y > Allegrex support was submitted by a newcomer and it was a perfect example > of how a good submission looks like. Sure it wasn't perfect, there were = a > couple of minor issues, but it was made with due dilligence and it was a > pleasure to review. So it's not that it cannot be done. > > FWIW, > > Maciej --=20 YunQiang Su