public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
To: "Cui, Lili" <lili.cui@intel.com>
Cc: "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	 "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Intel: SHLD/SHRD have dual meaning
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:47:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZc-bzv4G0sg7PgP4oLMXyGhrYsp28dQkniyf8d85+-80F7OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB560099E06545D2591C9B56CE9E122@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 3:44 PM Cui, Lili <lili.cui@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On 22.04.2024 06:09, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:29 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Since we uniformly permit D suffixes in Intel mode whenever in AT&T
> > >> mode an L suffix may be used, we need to be consistent with this.
> > > I think we need to forbid the D suffix for APX NDD SHL/SHR under Intel
> > > mode to avoid ambiguity.
> >
> > Hmm. Special casing just two insns is out of question imo (in fact that's what
> > is - unintentionally - partly happening prior to the change here).
> >
I know  the suffix L is needed in AT&T mode to specify the operand
size to avoid ambiguity.
But why do we need the suffix D for Intel mode?



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19  9:28 Jan Beulich
2024-04-22  4:09 ` Hongtao Liu
2024-04-22  6:51   ` Jan Beulich
2024-04-22  7:43     ` Cui, Lili
2024-04-22  7:47       ` Hongtao Liu [this message]
2024-04-22  8:42         ` Jan Beulich
2024-04-22 11:36           ` Hongtao Liu
2024-04-22  8:45       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMZc-bzv4G0sg7PgP4oLMXyGhrYsp28dQkniyf8d85+-80F7OA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=crazylht@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=lili.cui@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).