From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A803889824 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 17:12:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A4A803889824 Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id l8so4599991pfu.1 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ePK4tgZFayrO9LgthvuhTCafQOiu9hZzK3InKMK8EQA=; b=b0QpuZLIryRcuDtxkKVDUc8JFcyrQBmoGXnVt6L2qaFHdhnjfFAHMEYAGmkTqfKzfX TC2FuOLwivX9wdCm+9qtZUq4ORwih8X3ZygDvPLaXSUDP2P8RLYMT6f33oE4Z2g3y7gD WZCaQ1dnRR+LvdX09TxjtG6Bh0lPA74L4yWA41oWewcS4m4VJ4XgwAOqI2gv+gC9qj0w 28nypaSR0WPaDiIc93bI4XGb86Slfwi+29rXewmZ1olgBIrfaU61fNSTvZWjzJgWC/QX aksUCknBDJj9nLHDvpkv2umTX5B1JEzDpZGHGiRgGaQX/dkfjVVWNGgZDS4wB3QSDW8c tITg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533nNHCU10SK07kEtHiH1yahpzFU8SA+T06N+bUwPqUku3F3SuEu HCnoGa68BZGI5qZxGBNGMIRVXEp05rbDlLey8riTwHQj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJhwBbwNbWM3x7lPKx1LLjvoomLlkzmLTkfNy+u8XhwulTX9n3vgDvEP+iDwer37rL9pVKIpJNbxXOXyD08J8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:190c:b0:4f7:e318:1a3f with SMTP id y12-20020a056a00190c00b004f7e3181a3fmr811440pfi.43.1647450723511; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:12:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <93cecdf2-b805-4508-9e34-89fd0011ccc9@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <93cecdf2-b805-4508-9e34-89fd0011ccc9@suse.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:11:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: drop L1OM/K1OM from gas plus associated tidying To: Jan Beulich Cc: Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3020.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 17:12:06 -0000 On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:42 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > It was the bugs / shortcomings dealt with here as a "side effect" > which made me raise the question of the utility of having the > rudimentary support for the two sub-architectures. Oddly enough > some of the bugs need fixing _before_ removing the support, or else > IAMCU would regress. Furthermore a new IAMCU test can be put in > place only _after_ removing the support. > > 1: assorted IAMCU CPU checking fixes > 2: drop L1OM/K1OM support from gas > 3: add another IAMCU testcase > 4: unify CPU flag on/off processing > 5: never set i386_cpu_flags' "unused" field > 6: don't accept base architectures as extensions > OK to all. Can you also remove L1OM/K1OM from ld and binutils? Thanks. -- H.J.