From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-87732-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 81007 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 15:03:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 80966 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 15:03:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f179.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:03:53 +0000
Received: by obbkp3 with SMTP id kp3so7666061obb.3        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.223.131 with SMTP id w125mr11594205oig.108.1431443031902; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.54.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5552318402000078000798A8@mail.emea.novell.com>
References: <20150511212331.GA1838@intel.com>	<5551F4E70200007800079575@mail.emea.novell.com>	<CAMe9rOpDbkeFbmNbQh0a1AKhAQy-cH4HJu20o_ERQaoR6sTxbQ@mail.gmail.com>	<55520C440200007800079718@mail.emea.novell.com>	<CAMe9rOpFgSyJm-oceuDkrBYnBQGv01ywCc43WySqX21NTJYi4Q@mail.gmail.com>	<555216370200007800079773@mail.emea.novell.com>	<CAMe9rOpOx=SSUZnCFimn4fBzFqNRDch8QYLn3Os_y7EfQH65Qw@mail.gmail.com>	<5552318402000078000798A8@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoqcr7aE8dr6E44KUK6JLrNMNcDNFFWhcb6K+14M=Y+=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> Yes. But then what was the point of you ripping out Disp16?

I removed it since it doesn't jump to the target.  Can you verify
that it does jump to "(nextip + disp16) & 0xffff, not jump to
"(nextip + disp16)"?


-- 
H.J.