From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2014 15:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24001 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2014 15:30:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ob0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:30:18 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wm4so3694067obc.3 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:30:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.40.201 with SMTP id z9mr44434obk.45.1396625416679; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.151.198 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:30:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140404094249.GA95857@msticlxl7.ims.intel.com> References: <20140403135955.GB25193@msticlxl7.ims.intel.com> <20140404094249.GA95857@msticlxl7.ims.intel.com> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support Intel SGX extension. From: "H.J. Lu" To: Ilya Tocar Cc: Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote: > On 03 Apr 08:42, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Attached patch adds support for new instructions inroduced here: >> > http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/329298-001.pdf >> > >> > Ok for trunk? >> >> Please remove Intel syntax tests since those instructions >> don't take any operand. >> > > Thanks, done. I removed se1-intel.d/x86-64-se1-intel.d and checked it in for you. There is no need to use "new" with Intel SGX instructions. Intel SGX instructions are sufficient. Thanks. -- H.J.