From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Don't load archive element after dynamic definition
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 04:34:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOq12bAN9rYq9oWhvkgtiwD0ekuPnUx0EWzDbX9AB+zKhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200903060752.GO15695@bubble.grove.modra.org>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:07 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 07:16:14PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:31 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 07:35:58AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 7:29 AM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:22:08AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > > > It's reasonably obvious that we need to load archive elements when
> > > > > > > they define IR referenced symbols, because the archive element might
> > > > > > > be an LTO object. What's not so obvious is whether loading of shared
> > > > > > > libraries should follow the same rule. I think they should, in order
> > > > > > > for LTO to get symbol resolution correct in corner cases. Basically
> > > > > > > LTO needs to know what shared libraries are loaded before
> > > > > > > recompilation. See commit a896df97b952 log comments.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is dynamic_def for this purpose.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your patch doesn't make changes to ld/plugin.c to inform LTO of the
> > > > > availability of these symbols. And if you did, then how does the
> > > > > linker work out whether or not the LTO recompilation depended on those
> > > > > symbols? If it did change LTO recompilation then you had better
> > > > > ensure the library really is loaded. By the time you work all of that
> > > > > out, if it is even possible, your patch will likely be very
> > > > > complicated indeed.
> > > >
> > > > A testcase?
> > >
> > > What don't you understand from my emails in this thread? I suggest
> > > you look at what happened with the testcase in PR26314, in regard to
> > > my comment
> > > The lto recompilation didn't see symbol references from libbfd.so and
> > > variables like _xexit_cleanup are made local in the recompiled
> > > objects. Oops, two copies of them.
> >
> > A testcase?
>
> You kindly provided it yourself.
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26314#c4
>
> It takes only a small amount of digging to see the _xexit_cleanup
> problem.
This particular problem came from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385
where GCC generated incorrect output and I do have a mitigation
patch.
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 17:28 H.J. Lu
2020-08-27 13:53 ` Alan Modra
2020-08-27 14:05 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-28 1:58 ` Alan Modra
2020-08-28 12:53 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-28 14:49 ` Alan Modra
2020-08-28 14:50 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-02 6:52 ` Martin Liška
2020-09-02 8:12 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-02 11:56 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-02 13:05 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-02 13:22 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-02 14:29 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-02 14:35 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-03 1:31 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-03 2:16 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-03 6:07 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-03 11:34 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2020-09-04 7:25 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-04 11:06 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-08 5:42 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-08 12:43 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMe9rOq12bAN9rYq9oWhvkgtiwD0ekuPnUx0EWzDbX9AB+zKhw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).