From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-82168-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16703 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2013 16:04:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 16692 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2013 16:04:42 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f173.google.com
Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:04:42 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gq1so3905086obb.4        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:04:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.165.2 with SMTP id yu2mr1748903oeb.78.1386605074417; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.105.174 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 08:04:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACysShjJS8sYZsPO3e8NL6ZTYXFmgiRTGNg=g_B4a8XDkaMXLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACysShjNGcO=Y5ZU=QDLWetw31FRZUu7ZYbvo2DyJWZ+eOZZ2Q@mail.gmail.com>	<20131129134722.GN9211@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<CAHACq4qbwykqOcTjuQovsqoE0d2dC4FAAtfZOxr=0XrYsViJqw@mail.gmail.com>	<20131203100957.GA3306@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<CACysShi4sKtg_R6RAhGmgKs0qRuvbsU3fLpC-Hz27YMy-sGtrA@mail.gmail.com>	<20131203112323.GC3306@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<CACysShiAr=iLP2Ju2dWsubV5USXxDhQitmydvRfC2=b07Fp7hA@mail.gmail.com>	<CACysShiCkBdFOx233aBu02esXboe0dBTgf92grxUoEWRbNgUDQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CACysShjJS8sYZsPO3e8NL6ZTYXFmgiRTGNg=g_B4a8XDkaMXLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOq7f6dh3zMSYR5xNFt=33SuiReL=WEHcGL3sGHK4Rxmtg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gold, strip] Question about the changed offset when stripping
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com>
Cc: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>, binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>, 	Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, after updating to gdbserver 7.6 I was able to load the debug
>> info.. Also if I firstly just objcopy the linked binary (thus, erasing
>> the padding between .got.plt and .bss) and then strip
>
> sorry: I've accidentally sent it before finishing. I meant that if I
> firstly objcopy the linked binary (thus, erasing
>  the padding between .got.plt and .bss) and then strip it, then
> gdbserver<->gdb are successfully loading the debug info even for
> gdbserver < 7.6.
> That's cause in this case the addresses of all remained sections in
> stripped and not stripped binaries are the same.
>

Please open a bug report with a testcase to show
the actual problem with GDB.  I will take a look.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.