From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-108795-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7184 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2020 11:27:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 7176 invoked by uid 89); 11 Feb 2020 11:27:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:6fbca20, H*f:sk:6fbca20, HX-Spam-Relays-External:209.85.167.196, H*RU:209.85.167.196
X-HELO: mail-oi1-f196.google.com
Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com (HELO mail-oi1-f196.google.com) (209.85.167.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:27:57 +0000
Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id z2so12441607oih.6        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:27:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=HT5H2N8a2EZN3SBNTVTRUoHfl4BgeJlXW34GnFpEHzA=;        b=izE5smbPZxcF9DIkJRrYavHQutWfuVIp7nHQ5jBwXyqSwKleCh7WkPIbaPBwJVww1y         YcGD9VoFTKiyNBmQvdtupQOHazBov7kS0hZKWuUOM0DZ2wrabqaBU3VDl3VSs9gypLri         ii6MiF7oB2HCFTegAAAExkGBZ6YpTvA6ohO/iLtECZjw6wdeN9gxItsjk8oELLgTZK0B         WZnGU7T3QgsgbHLo9s3W+yZWJHUuyh1fp0wjHiZGUZrSJ31NHIHap++MRqsyyNJ6HxgN         836wZIwPL6Sz+5UbGE7UHg8hIJHSMdEoKf0SZsVCmkdh36fRcwAHO5khEY1wqmPdJ0QX         vRIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1e1b8eba-93ff-39ed-460a-a922d12af27e@suse.com> <6fbca201-5ae8-cf70-0614-f7f2efa6628f@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fbca201-5ae8-cf70-0614-f7f2efa6628f@suse.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqBQzmSs+GUEaz7mzx_3XTYYDLGgXzU8=5N+HYucFuipw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] x86: also disallow non-byte/-word registers with byte/word suffix
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:24 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Along the lines of be4c5e58bd ("x86: Always disallow double word suffix
> with word general register") also adjust check_{byte,word}_reg(), to make
> overall behavior consistent again in this regard.
>
> gas/
> 2020-02-XX  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         PR gas/25438
>         * config/tc-i386.c (REGISTER_WARNINGS): Delete.
>         (check_byte_reg): Skip only source operand of CRC32. Drop Non-
>         64-bit-only warning.
>         (check_word_reg): Consistently error on mismatching register
>         size and suffix.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/general.s: Replace dword GPR with word one
>         for movw. Replace suffix / GPR for orb.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/inval.s: Add tests for movw with dword and
>         byte GPRs as well as ones for inb/outb with a word accumulator.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/general.l, testsuite/gas/i386/intelbad.l,
>         testsuite/gas/i386/inval.l: Adjust expectations.
>

OK.

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.