From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24057 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2013 15:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24044 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2013 15:16:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oa0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:16:31 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h16so7533195oag.24 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.181.34 with SMTP id dt2mr1591398obc.30.1381245390097; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.110.15 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <525435E002000078000F9A55@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <5254349502000078000F9A3D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <525435E002000078000F9A55@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/MPX: suppress base/index swapping in Intel mode for bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx From: "H.J. Lu" To: Jan Beulich Cc: kirill.yukhin@intel.com, Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx assign special meaning to base and index > registers, and hence silently swapping the registers should be > suppressed. > > gas/ > 2013-10-08 Jan Beulich > > * tc-i386.c (i386_intel_simplify_register): Suppress base/index > swapping for bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx. > > --- 2013-10-07/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c > +++ 2013-10-07/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c > @@ -291,6 +291,8 @@ i386_intel_simplify_register (expression > else if (!intel_state.index) > { > if (intel_state.in_scale > + || current_templates->start->base_opcode == 0xf30f1b /* bndmk */ > + || (current_templates->start->base_opcode & ~1) == 0x0f1a /* bnd{ld,st}x */ > || i386_regtab[reg_num].reg_type.bitfield.baseindex) > intel_state.index = i386_regtab + reg_num; > else > > > We need a testcase for this. -- H.J.