public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: bring "gas --help" output for --32 etc in sync with reality
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:48:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqU87H4=K2ius51uFjHQjL7LcK3gPpiLraXGZM8U0J1qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8022ee5b-9663-94c4-a81e-3219a439545a@suse.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:26 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> The testsuite uses the output to determine whether BFD64 is in effect.
>
> --x32 is supported for ELF only; don't advertise it for PE/COFF. --64 is
> also supported for Mach-O; advertise it. Adjust the testsuite's BFD64
> check accordingly.
>
> Also replace "code" by "object", since it's the object format that the
> options primarily control. It's also _initial_ code bitness, but this
> can be changed by directives.
>
> gas/
> 2021-06-XX  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * config/tc-i386.c (md_show_usage): Split ELF and PE/COFF parts
>         of object format controlling option. Add Mach-O to the latter.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp (gas_bfd64_check): Adjust
>         accordingly.
>
> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -13719,10 +13719,14 @@ md_show_usage (FILE *stream)
>    fprintf (stream, _("\
>    -s                      ignored\n"));
>  #endif
> -#if defined BFD64 && (defined (OBJ_ELF) || defined (OBJ_MAYBE_ELF) \
> -                     || defined (TE_PE) || defined (TE_PEP))
> +#ifdef BFD64
> +# if defined (OBJ_ELF) || defined (OBJ_MAYBE_ELF)
>    fprintf (stream, _("\
> -  --32/--64/--x32         generate 32bit/64bit/x32 code\n"));
> +  --32/--64/--x32         generate 32bit/64bit/x32 object\n"));
> +# elif defined (TE_PE) || defined (TE_PEP) || defined (OBJ_MACH_O)
> +  fprintf (stream, _("\
> +  --32/--64               generate 32bit/64bit object\n"));
> +# endif
>  #endif
>  #ifdef SVR4_COMMENT_CHARS
>    fprintf (stream, _("\
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ proc gas_bfd64_check { } {
>      global AS
>
>      set status [gas_host_run "$AS --help" ""]
> -    return [regexp "32bit/64bit/x32" [lindex $status 1]];
> +    return [regexp "32bit/64bit" [lindex $status 1]];
>  }
>
>  if [gas_32_check] then {
>

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 10:23 [PATCH 0/6] x86: further value overflow diagnostic adjustments Jan Beulich
2021-06-14 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: off-by-1 in offset_in_range() Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:40   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-18 10:48     ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-14 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: make offset_in_range()'s warning contents useful (again) Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:40   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-14 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: harmonize disp with imm handling Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:46   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-17 14:57     ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 16:00       ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-17 16:05         ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 16:12           ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-18  9:03             ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-18 14:12               ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-18 14:52                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-18 15:41                   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-21  6:36                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-21 13:26                       ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-21 15:05                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-22 13:22                     ` Michael Matz
2021-06-22 14:01                       ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-22 14:32                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-22 14:35                         ` Michael Matz
2021-06-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: slightly simplify offset_in_range() Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:46   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: simplify .dispNN setting Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:47   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: bring "gas --help" output for --32 etc in sync with reality Jan Beulich
2021-06-17 14:48   ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-06-14 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86: further value overflow diagnostic adjustments H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOqU87H4=K2ius51uFjHQjL7LcK3gPpiLraXGZM8U0J1qA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).