public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: amodra@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] remove deleted BFDs from the archive cache
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqUYv9p64kjjF+2i_k6HwTjXGtMRSz6CjOn+49-XKmHqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208171556.q7HFuUNL016929@ignucius.se.axis.com>

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
<hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:04:18 +0200
>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
>> > With this I still see FAILS for cris-elf and cris-linux-gnu (but
>> > not for arm-unknown-eabi, mipsisa32r2el-unknown-linux-gnu,
>> > mmix-knuth-mmixware):
>> > Running /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/bsrc/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp ...
>> > FAIL: ar long file names (bfdtest1)
>> > FAIL: ar thin archive (bfdtest1)
>> >
>> > and in binutils.log:
>> > Executing on host: /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 tmpdir/artest.a   (timeout = 300)
>> > /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 exited with status 1
>> > /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 exited with status 1
>> > FAIL: ar long file names (bfdtest1)
>> > ...
>> > Executing on host: /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 tmpdir/artest.a   (timeout = 300)
>> > /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 exited with status 1
>> > /tmp/hpautotest-binutils/cris-axis-elf/binutils/bfdtest1 exited with status 1
>> > FAIL: ar thin archive (bfdtest1)
>> >
>> > Looking closer, it seems bfdtest1 is a new test, and a host
>> > program, which might explain the test-result differences.
>> > Shouldn't bfdtest1 be present and tested for native builds only?
>> >
>>
>> bfdtest1 is built the same as other programs.
>
> Not *test* programs.  It seems bfdtest1 is used as input to ar
> in the failing tests.
>
>>  valgrind
>> reports:
>>
>> ==3884==
>> ==3884== Invalid read of size 8
>> ==3884==    at 0x403D85: bfd_generic_openr_next_archived_file (archive.c:765)
>> ==3884==    by 0x402CCA: main (bfdtest1.c:60)
>> ==3884==  Address 0x4c35ec0 is 208 bytes inside a block of size 296 free'd
>> ==3884==    at 0x4A079AE: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:427)
>> ==3884==    by 0x40D9B7: bfd_close (opncls.c:726)
>> ==3884==    by 0x402C9D: main (bfdtest1.c:53)
>> ==3884==
>>
>> My new test is doing its job.  There is a real bug.
>
> That might be, but I'm not sure random binary files for other
> architectures are expected to be valid input to ar.  Is it?
> Ungracious failure surely, but I'm inclined to just skip the
> test (for my targets surely, for non-native if acceptable).

That is not what I saw.  bfdtest1 takes an archive as
input:

/export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-cris-elf/binutils/bfdtest1
tmpdir/artest.a
Executing on host:
/export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-cris-elf/binutils/bfdtest1
tmpdir/artest.a   (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-cris-elf/binutils/bfdtest1
tmpdir/artest.a^M
/export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-cris-elf/binutils/bfdtest1
exited with status 1
/export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-cris-elf/binutils/bfdtest1
exited with status 1
FAIL: ar long file names (bfdtest1)

It failed because bfdtest1 segfaulted.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-03 14:55 Tom Tromey
2012-08-03 16:12 ` Alan Modra
2012-08-03 20:56   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-08 22:47   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-09 10:35     ` Alan Modra
2012-08-15 20:14       ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-15 21:30         ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 14:47           ` Alan Modra
2012-08-16 16:31             ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-16 18:14               ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 18:33                 ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-16 18:45                   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 18:49                     ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-16 18:55                       ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 20:33                         ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 20:38                         ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-16 21:11                 ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-16 21:35                 ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  1:01                 ` Alan Modra
2012-08-17  1:06                   ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  2:44                     ` Alan Modra
2012-08-17  4:56                       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2012-08-17  5:04                         ` Alan Modra
2012-08-17  5:08                         ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  5:30                           ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  5:42                             ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  5:45                               ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17  6:01                                 ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 13:10                                   ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 16:50                                     ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2012-08-17 16:01                           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2012-08-17 16:10                             ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2012-08-17 16:14                               ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2012-08-17 16:13                       ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 16:26                         ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 16:51                           ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 17:11                             ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 17:22                               ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 17:22                                 ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 19:03                                   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 19:13                                     ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-18  4:37                         ` Alan Modra
2012-08-21  9:55                           ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17  1:17                   ` Alan Modra
2012-08-17 15:36                   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 15:38                     ` H.J. Lu
2012-08-17 15:43                       ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17  0:48           ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOqUYv9p64kjjF+2i_k6HwTjXGtMRSz6CjOn+49-XKmHqQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=amodra@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).