From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-86000-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18515 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2015 23:16:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 18503 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jan 2015 23:16:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f47.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:16:51 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id v63so5129300oia.6        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:16:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.198.133 with SMTP id w127mr3459863oif.74.1420672609406; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.185.7 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:16:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHACq4oyJDPhDew=JFB9urLw68QNQf5vDcKY6YOTdbq5h0L1Dw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150106210052.GA1643@intel.com>	<CAHACq4pqNwVobvOhhakDxgYv+V8e_NN=qb4LLiUpC1_uNSx9Uw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpdmkG4EwNqo+A=r5h4Ti_KsGo53oKOXtbpfec8mCkQ-Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAHACq4oyJDPhDew=JFB9urLw68QNQf5vDcKY6YOTdbq5h0L1Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqW8GOxciExwqp704cJVh4BDtdcSO7uV_fK0v+WoSV+iw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle Initial-Exec to Local-Exec for x32
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com> wrote:
>>> Do we need to support TLS relocations
>>> on instructions without a REX prefix?
>>
>> Well, it is
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17795
>
> Yeah -- I just wasn't yet sure whether you agreed with me.
>

I agree with you on this.  Sorry that I didn't make it clear before.


-- 
H.J.