From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa1-x2e.google.com (mail-oa1-x2e.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6563852C78 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 22:26:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4D6563852C78 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-oa1-x2e.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-141ca09c2fbso145268fac.6 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:26:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wLpgyvWLEdwcCh2auRRlK7cJQgPDeeWLGcn+U1tEROU=; b=D6BAbMAH6DHVC9LZKsEDnTvtwPlIdMu3qsfCW3LGHfxEeRMuHoPvPPxdb6Dh/9/iKt /EuoBRVTRzRRaamw5URtGzN+LRB+v4n23IkzFFdgwrgRX6UCdMpOmLFB9mkAWLi2aS56 U4EeHOMk1Onw5KrOF5EB/wFIWRnn8Y+Ss1DtMGavGoYtmrNfHAIlwlQ7s4cjlvkTXaA4 eO/aaJSX9bdtsCwMMpBI3eM5yrTSyfCaR9YXstW8K98DhZ0mpkEwa8oNn8YDnL78Xhcm 9K9fwvUvFBrcYq5pXTNnV0UGDwVm8Je9DfJqkhkOJ3dIcku+PcByO4tmU52McWBHmyxP iduw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=wLpgyvWLEdwcCh2auRRlK7cJQgPDeeWLGcn+U1tEROU=; b=u8BjcJHnRHx12f710T46Xt695/Agh2Z/a4Tq6m8V8oU9pwWCPMFIgLZhelxalnQexu s0lwPTTa5KQ6DdFwdzYJAiKCfobM8wfUkLPSzf0ihLmJ1pcFTBZJ8gqgPefaAmLjfIza 9n9c4ZfPWCySf6j/BGrOoxRKznpxdBaT3O2M+hpwC4UQjvdPgOeWRfi6llN1BCff62Sx OWi2WFUQfz1zoQa7w5nJw0vrU3nx7OqjT2iCNxmvwbb6U7BVdGeAa0Xu1/bMy//3Fzd1 1xWdlLVbEnd2SlrqjaKFJM+AHBZEi+CZPeulHEhWGwZ2NYbu31ljE047EO3AoMIYd2zW n5oQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plLu96+pbw2OXgtvD3tGJj/TnSy/rioHHKSheZQBdS5o7WtT9Nf dEMSu6SYXq9PD/3kx089e/EoVOYGIoyImm0cOQsAgnN5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf50/N0d6wchQBY9Iqo9S9FRTXHAcWjaDxQBFMd28vNTRidN9wjfV6NcZ+88Xu1q9Qq/fRg4RBLrB46PvRBEecM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:cb45:b0:13b:8bb8:5c5b with SMTP id oz5-20020a056870cb4500b0013b8bb85c5bmr31073190oab.298.1669847174482; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:26:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:25:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: get rid of LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX and No_ldSuf To: Jan Beulich Cc: Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3015.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:53 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > This fake suffix has long lost its original purpose (assuming it ever > had one fitting its name). > > 1: Intel: restrict use of LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX > 2: Intel: drop LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX > 3: drop No_ldSuf > 4: rework of match_template()'s suffix checking > > Jan OK to all. Thanks. -- H.J.