From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR ld/21402: Skip PIE indirect5 and indirect6 tests on i386
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqrTWa5Rt3Co5Gh5JREPdf515D7ZKKz5Lad+5Av3ipSGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424040944.GN24006@bubble.grove.modra.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3390 bytes --]
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:37:34AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> @@ -2863,10 +2867,14 @@ elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf)
>> int tls_type = elf_i386_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
>>
>> /* Make sure this symbol is output as a dynamic symbol.
>> - Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic. */
>> + Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic.
>> + PR ld/21402: If this symbol isn't undefined weak symbol,
>> + don't make it dynamic in PIE. */
>> if (h->dynindx == -1
>> && !h->forced_local
>> - && !resolved_to_zero)
>> + && !resolved_to_zero
>> + && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
>> + || !bfd_link_pie (info)))
>> {
>> if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h))
>> return FALSE;
>
> This doesn't look correct to me. Sure, it fixes the particular
> testcase, but why do you make non-pie non-undefweak symbols dynamic
> here? I believe that only undefweak symbols should be made dynamic
> here, and in all the other places in allocate_dynrelocs.
>
> x86_64 too, but fixing allocate_dynrelocs for x86_64 causes no-plt-1e
> to fail due to lack of a relative GOT dynamic reloc on
> cmpq func@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
> in no-plt-check1.S. Seems like x86_64 would need something like your
> change to elf32-i386.c to emit relative GOT dynamic relocs in
> relocate_section. (For powerpc I decided to only handle plt and copy
> relocs in finish_dynamic_symbol. GOT dynamic relocs are all handled
> in relocate_section as otherwise there is a lot of duplication and IMO
> less comprehensible code.)
>
>> @@ -3818,6 +3826,7 @@ elf_i386_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>> bfd_vma st_size;
>> asection *resolved_plt;
>> bfd_boolean resolved_to_zero;
>> + bfd_boolean relative_reloc;
>>
>> r_type = ELF32_R_TYPE (rel->r_info);
>> if (r_type == R_386_GNU_VTINHERIT
>> @@ -4268,6 +4277,7 @@ r_386_got32:
>> if (htab->elf.sgot == NULL)
>> abort ();
>>
>> + relative_reloc = FALSE;
>> if (h != NULL)
>> {
>> bfd_boolean dyn;
>> @@ -4301,6 +4311,17 @@ r_386_got32:
>> bfd_put_32 (output_bfd, relocation,
>> htab->elf.sgot->contents + off);
>> h->got.offset |= 1;
>> +
>> + if (h->dynindx == -1
>> + && !h->forced_local
>> + && h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefweak
>> + && bfd_link_pie (info))
>> + {
>> + /* PR ld/21402: If this symbol isn't dynamic
>> + in PIE, generate R_386_RELATIVE here. */
>> + eh->no_finish_dynamic_symbol = 1;
>> + relative_reloc = TRUE;
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>> else
>
> This also looks odd. Surely you need a relative reloc when pic, not
> pie? It seems to me you need one any time you won't be calling
> finish_dynamic_symbol (which is where x86 sets most dynamic GOT
> relocs) and have a symbol that doesn't resolve to zero.
>
I checked in this patch for i386. I will look into x86-64.
--
H.J.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-i386-Force-symbol-dynamic-if-it-isn-t-undefined-weak.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3435 bytes --]
From 0dc9a308a1ec9675bf6b33bae9e8b1faa0bad9ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:42:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] i386: Force symbol dynamic if it isn't undefined weak
Force symbol dynamic if it isn't undefined weak. Generate R_386_RELATIVE
relocation for R_386_GOT32 relocation against non-dynamic symbol in PIC.
PR ld/21402
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs): If a symbol isn't
undefined weak symbol, don't make it dynamic.
(elf_i386_relocate_section): If a symbol isn't dynamic in PIC,
set no_finish_dynamic_symbol and generate R_386_RELATIVE
relocation for R_386_GOT32.
---
bfd/ChangeLog | 9 +++++++++
bfd/elf32-i386.c | 17 ++++++++---------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index 6b969d6..54e2f0d 100644
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
2017-04-24 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+ PR ld/21402
+ * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs): If a symbol isn't
+ undefined weak symbol, don't make it dynamic.
+ (elf_i386_relocate_section): If a symbol isn't dynamic in PIC,
+ set no_finish_dynamic_symbol and generate R_386_RELATIVE
+ relocation for R_386_GOT32.
+
+2017-04-24 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
PR ld/21425
* elf32-i386.c (ELF_MAXPAGESIZE): Set to 0x1000 for VxWorks.
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-i386.c b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
index 83f3b11..9a568ce 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-i386.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
@@ -2748,7 +2748,8 @@ elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf)
Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic. */
if (h->dynindx == -1
&& !h->forced_local
- && !resolved_to_zero)
+ && !resolved_to_zero
+ && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak)
{
if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h))
return FALSE;
@@ -2867,14 +2868,11 @@ elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf)
int tls_type = elf_i386_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
/* Make sure this symbol is output as a dynamic symbol.
- Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic.
- PR ld/21402: If this symbol isn't undefined weak symbol,
- don't make it dynamic in PIE. */
+ Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic. */
if (h->dynindx == -1
&& !h->forced_local
&& !resolved_to_zero
- && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
- || !bfd_link_pie (info)))
+ && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak)
{
if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h))
return FALSE;
@@ -3035,7 +3033,8 @@ elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf)
Undefined weak syms won't yet be marked as dynamic. */
if (h->dynindx == -1
&& !h->forced_local
- && !resolved_to_zero)
+ && !resolved_to_zero
+ && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak)
{
if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h))
return FALSE;
@@ -4315,10 +4314,10 @@ r_386_got32:
if (h->dynindx == -1
&& !h->forced_local
&& h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefweak
- && bfd_link_pie (info))
+ && bfd_link_pic (info))
{
/* PR ld/21402: If this symbol isn't dynamic
- in PIE, generate R_386_RELATIVE here. */
+ in PIC, generate R_386_RELATIVE here. */
eh->no_finish_dynamic_symbol = 1;
relative_reloc = TRUE;
}
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 19:41 H.J. Lu
2017-04-21 1:09 ` Alan Modra
2017-04-21 18:37 ` H.J. Lu
2017-04-24 4:10 ` Alan Modra
2017-04-24 20:51 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2017-04-24 21:43 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMe9rOqrTWa5Rt3Co5Gh5JREPdf515D7ZKKz5Lad+5Av3ipSGQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).