From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-76934-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1607 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 18:09:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 1583 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2012 18:09:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:09:10 +0000
Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so4078123vcb.0        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.65.10 with SMTP id t10mr6633429ves.48.1346436548988; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.234.39 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5040CCC6.4030809@twiddle.net>
References: <503E009B.3080302@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<CAMe9rOrmiF3VZOBNvEbMV5jFNog1-_EoPoT9rHTUQFsANaSD8w@mail.gmail.com>	<503E3930.5040603@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<20120829.125208.824114683359549094.davem@davemloft.net>	<503F14A3.8070801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<CAMe9rOozW=4q_a=nmNvbZhsXooRZ4opvTTNtq2WHcGSSd2ONOw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpc7KHMXk8xrQV3p2fAn-uTWZJ91R6k=DbCXENs43Kemw@mail.gmail.com>	<5040CCC6.4030809@twiddle.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOr2Vic9vENNbRf5_z22-kMS2Uu-6Lsgd_Xi6bctw6CF4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Fix two issues with the IFUNC optimized mem* routines
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, aj@suse.com, 	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 06:02 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> @@ -3470,6 +3470,25 @@ elf_i386_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>
> Don't do these sorts of things in relocate_section.
>
> Do them in relax_section where you still have time
> to remove the got entry if it becomes unused.
>

This is an excellent idea.  But  relax_section is too late for
x86 and x86-64.  I need to do it in size_dynamic_sections
so that we can get proper GOT entries.


-- 
H.J.