From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA26386EC42 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:36:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org DCA26386EC42 Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id q25so2220116otn.10 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 05:36:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GBECNVihslyC/B0ON+p7A0lO0NdluTYN4OZPlpwKgKU=; b=Cg5fOovjwirW3dp5HjFNSvPlkr/qn6x1rZkVNaFzbXmEcIm7edCeJwgeHx+8XQsn0H KjTTy3wHuajGr1/bHchq9O4VmFW0G7MXN2zeW/iUD+/SsLGb8OaK19t0DPdUge67yOkO 1r0nzNFq6gKEbO3ipEQ8WHRqNxIRquJpD8mphXKGpOcq9t/R1YmMCodxYSHZ5/I1Ay5S P/BC37JLx0ySExNYOHdORR7ouBnVAarjA7WUTrDJH6yfckTe0R7oF0QeUmoXxN7MOz2p BaI+vgHqxw7u1eUdXh1bLC5lAywuxhQX9f5cHUYovG9wyvL9YAvdAO8jGEkdxtU8SXM1 zOfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53172jnkN0o2ya6yyzFF+mTKQt3zo4RqwyRGmMz2K/81WxPOG46M S21KWkEOfcMKcwxLF1H37EH4TZhYTrXmUWQt73Mb+bb5T24= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjyO5hkXXIiiy9Fus9ndU6nUrPsbsl4OZcg58CiMk3IKhneQAWzjqRj6i35chwKS08RHMvs7TQPxAxuM46arg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:10d2:: with SMTP id z18mr2789068oto.90.1610458612239; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 05:36:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201027110235.4137393-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <71dad297-88d3-5c81-1bd1-a55bd23b7780@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <71dad297-88d3-5c81-1bd1-a55bd23b7780@redhat.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 05:36:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement a workaround for GNU mak jobserver To: Nick Clifton Cc: Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3030.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:36:54 -0000 On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:26 AM Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi H.J. > > >> since the '+' is missing on the recipe line in Makefiles generated by > >> automake. Add the '+' to the recipe line by hand. > > Is this an automake bug that ought to be reported ? Yes https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2020-02/msg00012.html But my automake patch was rejected because automake developers believe that the choice of adding '+" belongs to package builders, not package developers. > >> bfd/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> binutils/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> config/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * jobserver.m4: New file. > >> > >> gas/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> gprof/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> ld/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> libctf/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > >> > >> opcodes/ > >> > >> PR binutils/26792 > >> * configure.ac: Use GNU_MAKE_JOBSERVER. > >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerated. > >> * configure: Likewise. > > > > I have checked the PGO/LTO build patches into master branch. Here > > is the updated patch to enable LTO jobserver with GCC 11. > > > > OK for master? > > Approved - please apply. > I will check it in shortly. Thanks. -- H.J.