From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90521 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2019 22:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90509 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2019 22:57:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:3087, H*f:sk:d0a68dd, H*i:sk:d0a68dd, H*c:alternative X-HELO: mail-oi1-f176.google.com Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (HELO mail-oi1-f176.google.com) (209.85.167.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:57:36 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id t206so335975oib.3 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:57:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kizm9BZQPu8s5kwoaDuZkJ1hlhpXRblB1Rtnmn5r+lA=; b=gMYfKtjIzkSirpx470g1KEK5kTfCuLRbdu9dEJ6gshlnEKygwKMudIKhb1X4eZqhFW iNysfDNjnVSOAe+4fmh8svVqbc20ZtnTNl2Cd90ZnZUDl3i/v9HXY4/B5riFo4/f65WF pxXN04ZpsMBAyRxc5jYJqJ/4V3Wj6HEG+7EA5zyD0GkFihX+K+mcRREt6OBsf6XaJFjO fIsm0uEvN703ntV46b5GZi3zvh/jIi33G/dGi3MR2cBwEJXSqOxBjlfrt8t2pL3LwRso wVT7citWRk0Z/GcQCxn3zENTKEdW/TQqoKcHawLOI3mmZhtKDf3UhwD8vHjIG+/r4mNR vJEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <27c4cd1c-2126-6e31-3faa-a7c31a4e67e1@arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, BFD, AArch64, x86] Improve warning for --force-bti. To: Sudakshina Das Cc: Nick Clifton , Binutils , nd , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Richard Earnshaw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 Isn't this command line option ELF only? Why not use "-z"? On Fri, Mar 22, 2019, 12:25 AM Sudakshina Das wrote: > Hi Nick > > On 21/03/2019 15:14, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Sudi, > > > >> *** bfd/ChangeLog *** > >> > >> 2019-xx-xx Sudakshina Das > >> > >> * elf-bfd.h (struct elf_backend_data): Add argument to > >> merge_gnu_properties. > >> * elf-properties.c (elf_merge_gnu_properties): Add argument to > >> itself and while calling bed->merge_gnu_properties. > >> (elf_merge_gnu_property_list): Update the calls for > >> elf_merge_gnu_properties. > >> * elfnn-aarch64.c (elfNN_aarch64_merge_gnu_properties): Update > handling > >> of --force-bti warning and add argument. > >> * elfxx-aarch64.c (_bfd_aarch64_elf_link_setup_gnu_properties): Add > >> warning. > >> * elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_merge_gnu_properties): Add argument. > >> * elfxx-x86.h (_bfd_x86_elf_merge_gnu_properties): Likewise in > >> declaration. > >> > >> *** ld/ChangeLog *** > >> > >> 2019-xx-xx Sudakshina Das > >> > >> * testsuite/ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp: Add new test. > >> * testsuite/ld-aarch64/bti-plt-1.s: Add .ifdef for PAC note > section. > >> * testsuite/ld-aarch64/bti-plt-6.d: Update warning. > >> * testsuite/ld-aarch64/bti-plt-7.d: Likewise. > >> * testsuite/ld-aarch64/bti-warn.d: New test. > > > > Approved - please apply. > > Thanks for the approval. Committed as > 4e5391148d51c58785aad637f1a92d47b91b3ae6 > > Sudi > > > > > Cheers > > Nick > > > > > >