From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0852B3857379
 for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:39:06 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0852B3857379
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id q140so71443pgq.6
 for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=WArSWtBNWLL/oTGl/DA91FOnSrqa8Jq/MqWjZMTTThM=;
 b=77QuApMDScLgCJGrSZJ5Vrgp71fZWjou/HHn5mJ7P7Fn5zWVxFTQMhx38/GSJWpHya
 upbEYpc4cgSnpo5CVW7wvm0Ph4hr//SdJcIkTpsZ0Ry6qhUna9gSvO5a0ihSwOgdqEQy
 RTK7DLScPy3KkxMQtXzcXoU2j4axms1uUZJx4YaIxHAVmzjwOiiCnZhtk/HjGPhmWJ6X
 v9vlbYEYfZO27d8Uhg413dLOHuXUpvnG6/JYoHLo4HA9ssnvHPFCIdSiCQHfUl1ZPKRo
 Zsb42RzyxjTUVQnA/2kx8arUPSjra45ZMOigaD4Ce5JYVpKApvpxsE5bkBh3ixx+9PzU
 6ZJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533d5a06vhokDdWlyVe2qwHUCp8Sq5b3TOefpIsdfLLivhPEj0Mh
 ILDJTk+EnhBQNre/Gfs56vmGdMKX23TbdmxP++b3UQPqEVw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIDabBqElYrEoV53TvVa4Mbaxb0QqKAXwrPmbUxsDgTtg7p1b91eM0xqF6v31Xs4Jg7S7DnEzk8eiPqfpv540=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:90c8:0:b0:3fc:ad6f:6e96 with SMTP id
 a191-20020a6390c8000000b003fcad6f6e96mr41444501pge.256.1654889945034; Fri, 10
 Jun 2022 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:38:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrLUODZOrvUuimbi_EHS=nLUwFTAkQrQODp+2AxO+yEug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Bug in dynamic linker ld 2.37.20211103-150100.7.29
To: pierre.lauber@aiub.unibe.ch, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, 
 Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3019.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Binutils mailing list <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/binutils>,
 <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/binutils>,
 <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:39:07 -0000

commit 17c6c3b99156fe82c1e637e1a5fd9f163ac788c8
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date:   Fri May 7 12:05:12 2021 +0200

    x86-64/ELF: clear src_mask for all reloc types

    x86-64 uses rela relocations. The comment next to the field's declaration
    says "Non-zero values for ELF USE_RELA targets should be viewed with
    suspicion ..." And indeed the fields being non-zero causes section
    contents to be accumulated into the final relocated values in addition to
    the relocations' addends, which is contrary to the ELF spec.

But for_main.o from

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2022-06/msg00064.html

has

  28: e8 fc ff ff ff        call   29 <main+0x29> 29: R_X86_64_PLT32
for_rtl_init_
  2d: e8 fc ff ff ff        call   2e <main+0x2e> 2e: R_X86_64_PLT32 MAIN__
  32: e8 fc ff ff ff        call   33 <main+0x33> 33: R_X86_64_PLT32
for_rtl_finish_

This is clearly wrong since addend is 0.  This is a bug in the
compiler which was
used to generate it.   If you have to use the buggy compiler, you need to use
binutils 2.36 or older.

-- 
H.J.