From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159043858415
	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 01:52:57 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 159043858415
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id g1so19522701lfu.12
        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=B1pCIEiOFIQoWOO9wgLk8nL8Hc+7yN94Jrd6yrpikE8=;
        b=aMp992b7lMnuY5NxPKyEvaWP1zdqfp+shDyLkSpulXI/k0pGkVSPmCv8Gg4AucHMfd
         RVZu5JyweUBoOmlC8nt4viZcsTiEBqfHas7lFgfTMVfqPyfBz3wMRxyu5UfpaLGjDcTQ
         njsfh+eHCB7eW9d5j2y9GpucGf0lT7qAoCdGPm3hObkUstrFAUXt9n0f2Z7qAWbKxxqU
         drs4El1kcj2jtSfOUdMCkEim3rEFlzG0ycGBisHWYS1YOXOuzrerV06aSv17R8z0fDl8
         Fkm45kjVMoRI246XL6uIWnn9EzKwO+pKc9ybwPPx2ePAPf2CB+3jYLaCdtKlNvnUZ+0F
         4RfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=B1pCIEiOFIQoWOO9wgLk8nL8Hc+7yN94Jrd6yrpikE8=;
        b=mpQB2yBSuYckkMgefSMUv3qxY9sdcW0DS23Y+oOtNutjpbMIYrK2GiDGjyQjxjflCW
         TV3diVnYTdlF3m1JQtbG/nP5WeOWSrBPEa+HH1/CCUeGoD7yHrZQ/vhwpe1WEn1t2qlD
         MOl7D5cxPCE7VPBiF9poEYs7NIHA/vEMRSQRg0F2fMkL8TyereS+uK7Kvis98inxMWdI
         4DDNpy4QaxwmiDHjqAFKaqtLi5P8GJ420DcMu4f2ElXGMl7Ac8ox/pK3SQbuNEKKYyEO
         mLtNxxFpqXjFUKvFCnbBUHulao1onJuqLDjSLGljHTKOaNVu6OjoBY/94JzXr/osm21A
         iSTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2CirQ5ct5LmldlLUdfcVJ1z+xYYW89ZdcbtVDKMxrED+1lTgab
	UBIG4EIe+IQ0p75xHAhya5LqPx+HKEmJr9DAdsM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6N8qx3uQWO7iQn6XUw0bTXeOxRDbkcsAifJxdNkCJaWvtPETToNVeN3PbmbWHznViF/cJlrtzhrJie6u5AYpA=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c47:0:b0:4a2:c07b:4b62 with SMTP id
 o7-20020ac24c47000000b004a2c07b4b62mr12102680lfk.426.1666662775086; Mon, 24
 Oct 2022 18:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221014091248.4920-1-haochen.jiang@intel.com>
 <20221014091248.4920-3-haochen.jiang@intel.com> <314edc15-48fc-d8fa-3bb0-4bb2fe9fc86c@suse.com>
 <SA1PR11MB59460A38DE4C913B05756D1CEC2D9@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB59460A38DE4C913B05756D1CEC2D9@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:52:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrLmN4hUxm_YBrXdrqUFcniKZkgVDG+_YbYEYK60DS1hA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Support Intel AVX-VNNI-INT8
To: "Jiang, Haochen" <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>, "Cui, Lili" <lili.cui@intel.com>, 
	"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3016.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:22 PM Jiang, Haochen <haochen.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 6:58 PM
> > To: Jiang, Haochen <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
> > Cc: hjl.tools@gmail.com; Cui, Lili <lili.cui@intel.com>;
> > binutils@sourceware.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Support Intel AVX-VNNI-INT8
> >
> > On 14.10.2022 11:12, Haochen Jiang wrote:
> > > --- a/opcodes/i386-gen.c
> > > +++ b/opcodes/i386-gen.c
> > > @@ -247,6 +247,8 @@ static initializer cpu_flag_init[] =
> > >      "CPU_AVX512BW_FLAGS|CpuAVX512_FP16" },
> > >    { "CPU_AVX_IFMA_FLAGS",
> > >      "CPU_AVX2_FLAGS|CpuAVX_IFMA" },
> > > +  { "CPU_AVX_VNNI_INT8_FLAGS",
> > > +    "CPU_AVX2_FLAGS|CpuAVX_VNNI_INT8" },
> > >    { "CPU_IAMCU_FLAGS",
> > >      "Cpu186|Cpu286|Cpu386|Cpu486|Cpu586|CpuIAMCU" },
> > >    { "CPU_ADX_FLAGS",
> > > @@ -443,6 +445,8 @@ static initializer cpu_flag_init[] =
> > >      "CpuAVX512_FP16" },
> > >    { "CPU_ANY_AVX_IFMA_FLAGS",
> > >      "CpuAVX_IFMA" },
> > > +  { "CPU_ANY_AVX_VNNI_INT8_FLAGS",
> > > +    "CpuAVX_VNNI_INT8" },
> > >  };
> >
> > Like in patch 1 CPU_ANY_AVX2_FLAGS also needs adjustment if AVX2 is
> > taken as a prereq to AVX-VNNI-INT8.
>
> Fixed.
>
> Also changed the AVX_VNNI_INT8 in comments in i386-opc.tbl to AVX-VNNI-INT8.
>
> Haochen
> >
> > Jan

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.