From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-79029-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29712 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2013 16:47:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 29619 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2013 16:46:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:46:55 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d1so140207qca.30        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:46:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.73.232 with SMTP id o8mr23736512qev.0.1360082814039; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:46:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.131.102 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:46:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130205093846.GH5023@bubble.grove.modra.org>
References: <1356420600-11507-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>	<1358483201-12733-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>	<1358483201-12733-2-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>	<CAKOQZ8ykkw_qvScz-dYyHnTEqEuz-Ccp1Uhfr5e1F31JM1KiTA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOoRUxVop0cEaC9eM7RU17d+2cmR+h+6UEqTr+wxM8LNKg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKOQZ8y7cQvXi7GgNhQjNq4K1NRwz3tTxJJK9BrchYXqhn48Yg@mail.gmail.com>	<20130205093846.GH5023@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrNcBfSZ41BfyFSFTfX=UxZEW7q7cdxRqzvp7cETwomPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] gold: enable new dtags by default
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, 	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:43:04PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> It seems that we have made sensible-seeming decisions to wind up in an
>> absurd place.
>
> Right, so where did we go wrong?  I think it was in assuming that we
> could default to --enable-new-dtags.  Users were affected.  (I'm
> assuming HJ's PR ld/15096 came from a real world problem.)
>
> I propose reverting HJ's patch, and Mike's and Roland's 2013-02-21
> patches.  That will leave us with just Mike's 2013-01-18 change to
> disable old dtags when new dtags are selected.  If people want new
> dtags by default, do so via the gcc driver.
>

Or we can just revert my change and add --runpath.   -rpath will always
generate DT_RPATH and --runpath will generate DT_RUNPATH.   What
should happen when both -rpath and --runpath are on command line?

-- 
H.J.