public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kirill.yukhin@intel.com, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86/MPX: fix address size handling
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrZuQRgcaUNgex=MDFjKYxsJimK1aCMqzEyM2XbZXCo4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525435BC02000078000F9A51@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> While address overrides are ignored in 64-bit mode (and hence shouldn't
> result in an error), trying to use 16-bit addressing is documented to
> result in #UD, and hence the assembler should reject the attempt.
>
> gas/
> 2013-10-08  Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * tc-i386.c (md_assemble): Alter address size checking for MPX
>         instructions.
>
> --- 2013-10-07/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ 2013-10-07/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -3549,10 +3549,15 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
>    if (i.bnd_prefix && !i.tm.opcode_modifier.bndprefixok)
>      as_bad (_("expecting valid branch instruction after `bnd'"));
>
> -  if (i.tm.cpu_flags.bitfield.cpumpx
> -      && flag_code == CODE_64BIT
> -      && i.prefix[ADDR_PREFIX])
> -    as_bad (_("32-bit address isn't allowed in 64-bit MPX instructions."));

It is done on purpose.  When 32-bit address prefix in 64-bit is ignored,
MPX doesn't work correctly for x32.

> +  if (i.tm.cpu_flags.bitfield.cpumpx)
> +    {
> +      if (flag_code == CODE_64BIT && i.prefix[ADDR_PREFIX])
> +       as_warn (_("32-bit addressing is ignored in 64-bit MPX instructions"));
> +      else if (flag_code != CODE_16BIT
> +              ? i.prefix[ADDR_PREFIX]
> +              : i.mem_operands && !i.prefix[ADDR_PREFIX])
> +       as_bad (_("16-bit addressing isn't allowed in MPX instructions"));
> +    }
>
>    /* Insert BND prefix.  */
>    if (add_bnd_prefix
>
>
>



-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-08 14:36 [PATCH 0/6] x86: various MPX fixes Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/MPX: testsuite adjustments Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/MPX: fix address size handling Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:15   ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2013-10-08 15:20     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:32       ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-09  7:30         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-09 15:45           ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-10 12:27             ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 15:18               ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/MPX: suppress base/index swapping in Intel mode for bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:16   ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 15:23     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:34       ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 16:00         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 16:19           ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-09  7:15             ` acceptance rules (was: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/MPX: suppress base/index swapping ...) Jan Beulich
2013-10-09 16:45               ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/MPX: bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx only allow a memory operand Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:28   ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-09  7:24     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-09 15:17       ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/MPX: fix operand size handling Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 15:45   ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-09  7:36     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-09 15:51       ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-10 13:14         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 15:14           ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-12 15:58             ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-12 17:12               ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-08 14:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/MPX: bndmk, bndldx, and bndstx don't allow RIP-relative addressing Jan Beulich
2013-10-08 16:13   ` H.J. Lu
2013-10-09  7:40     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOrZuQRgcaUNgex=MDFjKYxsJimK1aCMqzEyM2XbZXCo4w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kirill.yukhin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).