From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8310138CC7B2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:38:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8310138CC7B2 Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id 136so7079522pfy.10 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8Hofz0d9mO1gpx4u7j9R6/JuQuFcwMfqILn0ddLiUS0=; b=KAnxQ53l/X/JMs+lNzGJovCK0EJcE10Y1EK7lWXDrmi+dFbIrwlLhUdzouysrxlnRh oLjEPbZHhL3tnI//Jog4JlGv2vP0m792q8oPnYyCyeZewKG9dv6P14I4uPVy0UlqvJAT SRW/yh/tqszLjPAWQayE7evWJ2PzqAgRSTg4xM0ZnHnKRHBxW7JQ/NJ5rF25Pyt4yeAT AQVmIe+3QJH21nxt1Zd+DLlrTSpItT1of/m6y/kUc8JaRKCHkf+hfeRjdzQ4pqjw0L9y j9Nz0QLu/hf6MmnEmHaNEKqPkWQJyd3nv79E/xYeDlAYNgcZlCJBKXaQ86SRX1ZkQQok ZdqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/TYWc3qHhOd/f4SWbdRaMtbX6NLdK6EftNYyT1304HKTlrXl/N GzKUndqQMl1oxN4r/kyl06eNPFyUFuM/kqRtiWRxIkpq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tvTiPtbqqvuNs3QGlJNc32UUfhEM8NCHK3PaOuy32M2kTmR7ob/eP3YE8jZzOP3QJ2KbxJCFNJie8Qv2w3WFY= X-Received: by 2002:a63:b54c:0:b0:40c:7b84:4f7f with SMTP id u12-20020a63b54c000000b0040c7b844f7fmr17436515pgo.586.1656427117456; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <60964c64-ce74-5f99-3323-3faa3ff1102f@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <60964c64-ce74-5f99-3323-3faa3ff1102f@suse.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:38:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: drop stray NoRex64 from XBEGIN To: Jan Beulich Cc: Binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3019.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:38:40 -0000 On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > Presumably this being there was a result of taking CALL as a reference > when adding the RTM insns. But with No_qSuf the attribute has no effect. > > --- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl > +++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl > @@ -1911,7 +1911,7 @@ xrelease, 0xf3, None, CpuHLE, No_bSuf|No > > // RTM instructions > xabort, 0xc6f8, None, CpuRTM, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Imm8 } > -xbegin, 0xc7f8, None, CpuRTM, JumpDword|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|NoRex64, { Disp16|Disp32|Disp32S } > +xbegin, 0xc7f8, None, CpuRTM, JumpDword|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp16|Disp32|Disp32S } > xend, 0xf01d5, None, CpuRTM, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {} > xtest, 0xf01d6, None, CpuHLE|CpuRTM, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {} > OK. Thanks. -- H.J.