From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-76782-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14571 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2012 00:23:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 14559 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2012 00:23:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:22:59 +0000
Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so4014183vcb.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.37.233 with SMTP id b9mr3344703vdk.107.1345249378274; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.234.39 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1208132226180.20608@tp.orcam.me.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1208132226180.20608@tp.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOre_1DAQavKTYtvqs9xGVUsbJFGf2kLwntga-TYw39O6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING] LD: Hidden/internal versioned symbol preemption bug
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
<macro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Is there anything I could do to help with the review of this change?
>
>  It is a pretty fatal failure affecting all targets, so I would like to
> see it fixed in the upcoming release which I have been told is happening
> by the end of this month and I'll be disappearing for a fortnight starting
> from Wednesday.
>
>  Included below verbatim for easy reference and the complete series posted
> here:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00159.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00160.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00161.html
>

May I suggest you open a bug report with a testcase and
resubmit your patch with the testcase to fix the bug?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.